8
submitted 1 year ago by kyr7x@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

So, group of people who say "just build more"

How exactly are we going to do that affordably?

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Build..... Build more building material?

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unironically this, sort of. More construction workers. It's due to a labour shortage, which is pretty expected when you start building way more.

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe if companies could settle their offices elsewhere than the three major city centers, Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal, there could also be more space to develop and other labour available from that region.

We wouldn't need to build big high-rise condo projects with nothing but 500 square foot single bedroom apartments due to land constraints.

[-] MooseGas@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It's like Factorio

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

Immigrants, or temporary foreign workers.

We'll need more houses for that, of course, but obviously construction workers build more houses than they live in.

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

The article doesn't even talk about labour costs, it exclusively refers to the increased materials costs.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I admit I just skimmed it, but a worker shortage actually is mentioned.

Yeah, material shortages are harder, but they're kind of a short term thing due to plant shutdowns and forestry disruptions. I wonder how forestry is going to adapt as the tree line moves north.

[-] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Here in BC, record forest fires year after year are certainly having an impact, although the mountain pine beetle fallout is finally also coming to fruition.

It was open season on beetle killed timber for over a decade, creating a glut of timber supply. It's just going to go to waste anyways (up in smoke a fair amount as well). I think most of that beetle kill is done with now, or at least the easier logged stuff.

If we kept up on replanting, it usually takes 20-40 years for most of the tree species harvested in BC to mature, so those replanted trees wouldn't be mature for another 10+ years anyways. Now throw in the heat dome, droughts, etc. and it just gets more fun (and fiery).

I'm not a forester or silviculturist, and I'm not on the logging side of the business, but my impression is that there just isn't going to be as much cheap lumber available in BC, potentially ever. I would chalk a large part of this to global warming, right from the original pine beetle infestation. This means that the underlying problem is bigger than the government of BC can fix on it's own, but I would have hoped to see more vigour in a push for climate action from the people of BC, specifically those whose forest industry jobs are threatened.

[-] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Not 20-40 years in BC, but 80-120 years. Good news is that the lands harvested in the 60s and 70s will start to mature in 20 years. But we're going to have a shortfall until then.

this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
8 points (78.6% liked)

Canada

7144 readers
291 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS