125
Why there are no warlords in anarcho-capitalism.
(hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
125 points (99.2% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15912 readers
517 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Dear Company B,
We recognize the unfortunate circumstances you find yourselves in, and understand your concern. After careful review of your request to invoke article 69 of the non-aggression contract, we have established a committee to review the fluid and rapidly evolving situation to ensure that the appropriate conditions are met to invoke such a serious response to the actions of Company A, in full compliance with the articles of the contract. Currently, this committee is set to meet at a date so far in the future that your assets will already be fully occupied and operated by Company A, as well as ourselves under the auspices of preventing occupation by Company A. We are unable to provide any further information at this time, as it is Company policy to not comment on ongoing arbitration.