96
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Derproid@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

So the interesting part in my mind for this is that you would die and be gone, there would just exist another entity that can perfectly replicate you. Take for example the case of there being two of you, which one is the real one? The original? What if I kill the original? Does the new one become the real you? But what if I don't kill you but let the duplicate replace your life. Are you the real you trapped in some cell, or is the duplicate the real you living your life?

My point really is that it's all a matter of perspective. For everyone else the clone would be the real you, but from your perspective you are the real you and the clone stole your life.

[-] Nemo@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not my body and I'm not my mind. I am the ethical soul, the decision-making process. If the replacement makes all the same decisions I would, it IS me.

[-] Derproid@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The thought process assumes it is a complete and perfect cloning of all aspects we do and don't understand. The reason the clone is not you is because if I do something to the clone it does not affect you.

Like if you take a water bottle and clone it, drinking one does not cause the other to be empty. Thus they must be two separate things.

[-] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

If both the original and the clone are identical, then at that moment they are both me, and neither is more valid than the other. That there's two of me does not invalidate either version. Neither do their divergences going forward.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

What if something like ChatGPT is trained on a dataset of your life and uses that to make the same decisions as you? It doesn't have a mind, memories, emotions, or even a phenomenal experience of the world. It's just a large language data set based on your life with algorithms to sort out decisions, it's not even a person.

Is that you?

[-] Nemo@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

No, because not all my decisions are language-based. As gotchas go, this one's particularly lazy.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 year ago

I'm having a hard time imagining a decision that can't be language based.

You come to a fork in the road and choose to go right. Obviously there was no language involved in that decision, but the decision can certainly be expressed with language and so a large language model can make a decision.

[-] Nemo@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

But I don't make all my decisions linguistically. A model that did would never act as I do.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It doesn't matter how it comes to make a decision as long as the outcome is the same.

Sorry, this is beside the point. Forget ChatGPT.

What I meant was a set of algorithms that produce the same outputs as your own choices, even though it doesn't involve any thoughts or feelings or experiences. Not a true intelligence, just an NPC that acts exactly like you act. Imagine this thing exists. Are you saying that this is indistinguishable from you?

[-] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

"Is something that acts exactly like you act indistinguishable from you?"

Well, yes.

Sort of begs the question by assuming there should be one "real you". Why is this a restriction? Why not two real yous?

You an hour from now is every bit you as the you that exists 2 hours from now. They're not identical, but both exist, same space just at different points in time. So why not two "yous", not identical, at the same time just at different points in space?

[-] Derproid@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Because there being two real yous doesn't make sense. Like you can have two identical things but they can not be the same thing, there must be a you #1 and a you #2. Like if I have two water bottles, they are two identical things but they are not the same thing. Changing one of them does not affect the other, thus they are not the same thing.

I'm not saying they're identical, I'm saying they're both "you". That's different.

There are many "you"s already. Consider "you" at different points in time. You recognise it's all the same individual, but they are not identical.

Hence my last sentence. We're comfortable with a variety of non-identical "you"s separated by time. So why not a variety of non-identical "you"s at same time, only separated by space.

Our definition of identity is not tight because it doesn't have to deal with situations like these. We having a working definition something like "the continuous experience of memories, personality and sensation in a body" that serves to help us identify the "you" from yesterday as the same person as the "you" now. They're not identical. What they have in common is a shared continuous physicality.

But if some sci-fi type cloning were possible where two "you"s step out from the one, then both could claim to have a shared continuous physical continuity with the "you" now. And as such both have the same and equal claim on who is the "real" one. As because of that why can't they both be you? Both with separate ongoing experiences. But both "you" in every bit the same way as you claim to be the same "you" as yesterday.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

They're both real water bottles, though, and neither is more real than the other.

[-] Derproid@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, my point is that they aren't the same bottle.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

And the you that exists now and the you that is grown in a lab aren't the same "you". You're both legitimate versions, though.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

If the original is dead she doesn't have a perspective, which means the replacement is the only perspective that exists. As such, she is equally the real me just like I am.

My replacement can have my life if I'm not using it - in fact, I want her to! It'd be a shame if my life went to waste because I was dead.

Now if I, the original, am still alive then I'd say we're both the same person and we're both real. Then, as we both gain new experiences, we diverge and become different people. Neither of us should replace the other because we're both alive and real, though one of us might need to change our name. Even then? We'll flip a coin to see who keeps the original name.

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
96 points (96.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27241 readers
1527 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS