500
submitted 4 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 136 points 4 months ago

My favorite part was how they kept mentioning the sign language interpreters and then never showing them again. Like, give them a picture-in-picture or something. Otherwise, what's the point?

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 56 points 4 months ago

And just off camera we have sign interpreters. We wont show them but they are there

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

close-up of lips so the hearing impaired can lip read

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Freeze those lips!

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago

My wife said the same thing during the game lol

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

I'm old enough to remember when shows used to have ASL interpreters in a little window. All the time. But I haven't seen it much since the 80s.

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 28 points 4 months ago

I imagine widespread adoption of closed captioning has reduced the need for ASL interpreters on TV.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

That makes sense.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

We switched to closed captions over the course of the 90s. Irl events still use terps but using then on screen is now a specific choice. Usually the only times you’ll see ASL on screen these days is presidential addresses and shows that make a point to cast signers for Deaf characters

[-] Kase@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I have a question about this, if anybody can help me out. Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing people generally fluent in English (at a similar rate to the general population)? I've heard anecdotes about Deaf people who only know ASL, little to no English, but I don't know how common that actually is. Mainly curious about the US.

I know ofc it's more complicated than that (ASL isn't the only sign language used here, and English isn't the only spoken language, not all Deaf/HH people use sign language, etc.), but I'm just trying to get an idea of the big picture. Like when it comes to TV, are closed captions generally considered 'accessible' by the Deaf community?

Apologies if that didn't make much sense, I had trouble wording it.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

So it depends a lot on age, location, and severity of hearing loss. First Deaf and deaf aren’t the same thing. Capital D Deaf means culturally Deaf regardless of severity of hearing loss. Someone can be hard of hearing and Deaf and someone who hears worse may not be. Hoh and deaf people who aren’t Deaf usually are either late deafened or were mainstreamed (basically given hearing aids and usually not taught sign). Little d deaf implies hearing loss severe enough that it would require yelling to have an unaided verbal conversation (not precise but it’s generally accurate).

So for starters, if you grew up with the internet you’re probably fluent in written language, probably English. Unless you’re from a time and place where hearing people weren’t literate you’re probably literate as a deaf person. And to my knowledge there are no widely adopted sign language written forms beyond all caps words in language common to area with sign syntax. That’s why when you see Deaf people struggling with verbal languages it’s usually issues of spelling or syntax not vocabulary. But there’s also fingerspelling. There are a lot more words than signs. Common words quickly get a sign, but shit you don’t have to express face to face often to another Deaf person like professional jargon, you just spell it out.

But think about the 80s-90s in America. People who didn’t learn to read in school were still around. Especially if the system didn’t really care and their parents were illiterate. Even now there are people who can read but not at speaking speed. Captions are fine now, it’s like English to the Dutch. You’ve been using it in entertainment at least partly your whole life. But when it was a language someone half bothered to teach you at ten not so much

[-] Kase@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Thank you for your response!

Wow, yeah, I hadn't even considered what difference the internet would have made. Way too often I forget to think about history in its greater context.

And to my knowledge there are no widely adopted sign language written forms beyond all caps words in language common to area with sign syntax.

Not as far as I know, either. About a year ago I learned about a ministry group that translated the entire Christian bible into ASL and made an app where you could watch the videos. I don't remember the name, but it was cool to learn about. (IIRC, that project was what got me caught up on this question in the first place, lol.)

When you say 'sign syntax,' does that mean the same thing as gloss? For example:
YESTERDAY, HOME IX-me STAY

I see it used all the time as a tool for English -> ASL students (of which I am one, lol), but it's never crossed my mind to wonder what ways it is (and what ways it isn't) used by the Deaf.

If you don't mind me asking, are you or someone in your life Deaf? Just curious, since it sounds like you're more informed than the Average Joe. :)

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah there’s a thing where Christians like for their texts to be in every language. It’s probably a lot more of that than anything. ASL was developed by nuns IIRC. It’s definitely not like Plains Sign Language which began as a trade language and eventually developed for the deaf. For as long as modern people of European descent have had sign language we’ve had access to Jesus in it.

I’d give more context but my asl is shit. I don’t really sign beyond insulting the hearing. I’m third generation mainstreamed. (Yeah my great grandparents, grandparents, and parents were all convinced not to teach their children sign language by the experts of the time). And yeah that more or less answers two paragraphs. I’ve been wearing hearing aids since childhood and my mom, grandma, and sister all also have my degenerative hearing loss.

I grew up with captions on the tv in the 90s except when my father was watching with us (he hates captions, and I’ll acknowledge they did suck 25 years ago, just less than not hearing sucked). And in early adulthood I went on a journey of self discovery and community discovery of embracing my deafness but I still need to find the time and energy to commit to asl learning

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah there’s a thing where Christians like for their texts to be in every language. It’s probably a lot more of that than anything. ASL was developed by nuns IIRC. It’s definitely not like Plains Sign Language which began as a trade language and eventually developed for the deaf. For as long as modern people of European descent have had sign language we’ve had access to Jesus in it.

I’d give more context but my asl is shit. I don’t really sign beyond insulting the hearing. I’m third generation mainstreamed. (Yeah my great grandparents, grandparents, and parents were all convinced not to teach their children sign language by the experts of the time). And yeah that more or less answers two paragraphs. I’ve been wearing hearing aids since childhood and my mom, grandma, and sister all also have my degenerative hearing loss.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Garrett Morris was the best sign interpreter of all time.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I imagine those are more for people in the stadium. The people watching it on TV have closed captioning.

this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
500 points (92.8% liked)

News

21695 readers
2951 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS