Tell that to admins with strong opinions, and other admins who don't wanna anger admins with strong opinions and get defederated for not defederating the offenders.

[–] tymon@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

See, that would be such a better option. Let individual users block servers from appearing for them alone in any interactive sense. The Beehaw defederation was not only terrible timing, but it exposed the biggest achilles heel of this whole idea.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can you elaborate more on this? Its a tangent, but one I'm out of the loop on.

Why DID beehaw split?

[–] tymon@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not fully in the know on this by any means, but from what I understand, Beehaw's admins/mods decided to defederate from sh.itjustwor.ks and lemmy.world because of an inability to moderate effectively due to the massive influx of new Lemmy users last week - most of which were in those two instances, as they have open registration.

Beehaw requires you to apply to join.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How would splitting off fix that problem, though? If 100k users joined beehaw, and they stop syncing with the rest of the federation, they still have 100k new users to moderate.

Or am I looking at this backwards, and they want their gated garden, absent of slugs?

[–] tymon@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I think there's definitely a bit of a gated-garden mentality here, but it's mostly just being overwhelmed. If they had more help, or had ASKED for more help, it would probably have been much different. I'm new here myself so I'm not going to pretend to understand the nuances here.

[–] god@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Beehaw would not let 100k users into their platform to start with. They will grow according to their means to moderate. That's why they only allow sign-ups through application, go bring down the number of new sign-ups and filter by quality.