1438
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Vytle@lemmy.world 120 points 10 months ago

Bro can i just say that i fucking hate that anti-semetic is even an argument used when someone demonstrates support for Hamas? it doesnt even make sense because by definition both parties are semetic.

[-] SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world 150 points 10 months ago

I think there is a very good argument of antisemitism if you support Hamas. There is no argument for antisemitism if you support Palestinians.

[-] nixcamic@lemmy.world 74 points 10 months ago

Regardless of semantics, and how Israel's own actions are a very large part of the problem, you still gotta agree that Hamas is racist against Jews.

[-] Retrograde@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago

Indeed, in other words, just as the IDF is racist against Palestinians

[-] nixcamic@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

I'd agree that both states are racist. It's why I don't really think people should support Hamas or Israel carte blanche and why you can make a case that a blank unqualified statement of "I support (Israel/Hamas)" does seem quite racist.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"Hamas vs Israel" is a category error. It's Hamas vs Likud or Palestine vs Israel. Nobody should support Hamas or Likud. Nobody should even tolerate them. They're both terrorist groups whose goal is genocide.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

It's not racism. They are the same race. It's religious intolerance.

[-] LwL@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

"Race" for humans is a made up concept and "racism" has been used to refer to any kind of hating a group for their ethnicity. "Ethnicity" is a very ambiguously defined concept notably including shared attributes like nationality, language, history, religion, etc.

I, too, am not a fan of words being used incorrectly, but this is not an incorrect use of "racism".

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

but this is not an incorrect use of “racism”.

Israeli Citizenship is determined solely by religion. The only reason that a Palestinian can't be an Israeli citizen is they haven't converted to Judaism. That's religious discrimination.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_citizenship_law#:~:text=Every%20Jew%20has%20the%20unrestricted,one%20parent%20is%20a%20citizen.

Otherwise you'd also have to classify the Protestant vs Catholic wars in Europe as racist too.

[-] LwL@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

As I stated, it is not incorrect to use the term racism for religious discrimination, especially not when it involves a religion you can't just join at will. What matters is moreso whether they see themselves as a seperate people from whoever they discriminate against.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

religion you can’t just join at will.

But you can! It's in the article I linked.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

People are killing each other over land and historical grievances, not whether to call God Allah or Yahweh.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I agree that's part of the culture but it comes down to religion. If you are of Jewish faith, you have automatic citizenship in Israel.

When Ethiopia had its famine in the early 90's, the Ethiopian Jews, who were Black and culturally Ethiopian, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Solomon#/media/File%3AFlickr_-_Government_Press_Office_(GPO)_-_LINE_OF_ETHIOPIAN_IMMIGRANTS_STREAMING_OUT_OF_THE_HERCULES.jpg were evacuated to Israel simply because of their Jewish faith. Race had nothing to do with their becoming Israel citizens.

[-] volvoxvsmarla@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Biologically speaking, there is only one human race. So, does that make the word "racism" invalid? It's a stupid term whose origin makes no sense, but I'd argue its meaning had transcended its original linguistic root. Same for anti-"semitism".

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Biologically speaking, there is only one human race

The colloquial term for a group with common physical features is race. That biologists have a different technical meaning isn't relevant. If you deny that people categorize others and call it "race" then you deny racism.

Racial:

"relating to the major groupings into which humankind is sometimes divided on the basis of physical characteristics or shared ancestry."

I’d argue its meaning had transcended its original linguistic root.

But this is religious discrimination. I've already shown that neither ethnic group nor racial group matters in this situation.

[-] Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago

Who the fuck supports Hamas? It's an actual terrorist organization that's oppressing people in Palestine

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

You would be surprised. Some people are fucking insane.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago

Every source I find suggests that Hamas has significant support from the people of Palestine

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Damn I wonder why the people being subjected to genocide support the group fighting the genociders?

I just can’t work it out.

[-] S_204@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

You're telling me that you haven't seen those green headbands at 'peace rallys'? They're at every one I've seen on the news. Including the one where they attacked Santa LoL.

Those are Hamas flags. Dunno what that could be other than support.... they're rocking the merch.

[-] Custodian1623@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago

Colloquially yeah it makes a lot of sense to say Hamas is antisemitic, the word means hatred for Jews regardless of the etymology of 'semite'. Take it up with marriam-webster, not the people correctly using the modern definition of the word

[-] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 26 points 10 months ago

Hamas Charter, excerpt.
16. Hamas affirms that its conflict is with the Zionist project not with the Jews because of their religion. Hamas does not wage a struggle against the Jews because they are Jewish but wages a struggle against the Zionists who occupy Palestine. Yet, it is the Zionists who constantly identify Judaism and the Jews with their own colonial project and illegal entity.

[-] Custodian1623@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

if you choose to believe that Hamas is not antisemitic that's your prerogative. I only note that so long as there is a hatred of Jews the word is being used correctly.

[-] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I hear both (non-settler) Jews and Christians live in Gaza, that wouldn't be possible if Hamas was all about Jew hating...

[-] Custodian1623@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Where have you heard Jews live in Gaza?

[-] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 10 months ago
[-] uncouthterran@reddthat.com 6 points 10 months ago

After the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, the Jews of Mandatory Palestine became Israeli citizens, and the term Palestinian Jews has largely fallen into disuse and is somewhat defunct, in favour of the modern term Israeli Jews.

It says in the wiki article that they became Israeli citizens. What are you on about?

[-] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 months ago

Yet people still claim the label "Palestinian Jew" - are we to deny their claim to belief?

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago

(Different commenter here.)

I've heard there are a few Jews living among the Arab population of the West Bank. I've heard nothing about Jews living in Gaza except for Israeli colonists who have since moved out. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me that non-colonist Jews would live in the occupied territories, because they are free to move to Israel by virtue of being Jews.

There is a small population of Arab Christians living in Gaza, and I would assume in the West Bank as well, though I can't recall hearing about them specifically.

[-] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 3 points 10 months ago

You're not supposed to use the new one, it doesn't fit the narrative.

/s

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago

I can't argue with their charter, but their actions don't reflect their words.

[-] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I guess that would make Israel anti-Semitic as well.

[-] misophist@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

it doesnt even make sense because by definition both parties are semetic.

Oof, either you're just grossly misinformed and performing a cringey "ackchually", or you're anti-semitic yourself and perpetuating anti-semitic rhetoric.

While yes, both are Semitic people, the term 'anti-semitic' was specifically coined by Nazi Germany to make their genocide seem like it had a basis in science. They specifically used it to refer to Jews. Nobody uses "anti-semitic" to mean all semites except hate groups and holocaust deniers who are trying to say "see, it doesn't even mean Jews specifically! Jews are just playing the victim!"

I will assume you're simply ignorant or misinformed, but feel free to correct me if this was actually an intentional dog-whistle.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Due to the root word Semite, the term is prone to being invoked as a misnomer by those who interpret it as referring to racist hatred directed at all "Semitic people" (i.e., those who speak Semitic languages, such as Arabs, Assyrians, and Arameans). This usage is erroneous; the compound word antisemitismus (lit. 'antisemitism') was first used in print in Germany in 1879[17] as a "scientific-sounding term" for Judenhass (lit. 'Jew-hatred'),[18][19][20][21][22] and it has since been used to refer to anti-Jewish sentiment alone.

this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
1438 points (100.0% liked)

196

16546 readers
1930 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS