488
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

A former leader of the far-right Proud Boys extremist group was sentenced on Tuesday to more than three years behind bars for joining a plot to attack the U.S. Capitol nearly three years ago.

Charles Donohoe was the second Proud Boy to plead guilty to conspiring with other group members to obstruct the Jan. 6, 2021, joint session of Congress for certifying President Joe Biden’s electoral victory. His sentence could be a bellwether for other Proud Boys conspirators who agreed to cooperate with federal prosecutors.

Donohoe, 35, of Kernersville, North Carolina, apologized to his family, the law-enforcement officers who guarded the Capitol on Jan. 6 and “America as a whole” for his actions on Jan. 6.

“I knew what I was doing was illegal from the very moment those barricades got knocked down,” he said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] politicalincorruption@lemmy.world 62 points 10 months ago

The traitor deserves at least ten.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 57 points 10 months ago

I'm generally against large prison sentences, but he deserves life. He was attempting to deprive all Americans from having a say in our democracy. It's not like he was just hurting himself, or even just a few people.

[-] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 48 points 10 months ago

Per the article, he got a deal because he cooperated. I'm guessing that means he gave them intel on other people they could go after. Considering how light of a sentence he got, I'm guessing it was someone valuable. If we throw the book at everyone who cooperates nobody will cooperate.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 26 points 10 months ago

I guess but it seems like only 3-4 of them have gotten sentences higher than what you'd get for having a joint in Mississippi.

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

His cooperation contributed to those 4 convictions for seditious conspiracy.

In this case, the prosecution recommended 35-43 months. He got 40.

Edit: by 4 convictions, I mean Enrique Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, and Zachary Rehl.

[-] Lem453@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago

We've been hearing this since 2021. Who are the big names that have been charged with insurrection as a result of all these lenient sentences?

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

His cooperation seems to have led to serious convictions:

Tarrio - 22 years

Nordean - 18 years

Biggs - 17 years

Rehl - 15 years

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

I love seeing people ask questions that easily tell us that they're not paying attention.

"When will someone be punished?!?"

These dudes got decades in prison.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

Stewart Rhodes got 18 years out of a max of 20. Enrique Tarrio received 22 years.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago

We’ll find out ten years after they either retire or die.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Life. Without parole.

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Made an example of.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

A 10mm to the skull? C'mon. A 9mm would work just fine.

Sorry y'all, I got PTSD from that day, can hardly talk about it without crying and screaming. Can't look at pictures, let alone a 30-second video. Suffice to say, I'd pull the trigger myself and feel nothing.

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I think you need to get off the internet for awhile.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

You got PTSD from something you saw on TV so I'm gonna go ahead and suggest that literally killing a person would probably fuck you up pretty bad.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Of course it would? I am well aware.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Perhaps this should be a sign not to advocate for the opportunity

this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
488 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3672 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS