1021
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 128 points 6 months ago

How will the logistics of this work? Are there fast-food restaurants that would accept a privileged Karen with anger management issues as a member of their team? After all, they have a business with tight margins to run, and this sounds like a huge liability.

[-] MrShankles@reddthat.com 120 points 6 months ago

Free labor, and keep her away from customers. Cleaning, prepping, whatever. If she causes problems, she violates probation and serves the rest of time in prison. Give the store an incentive to deal with her. With thin margins, I'd take those odds. Fuck threatening to fire; if you fuck up, you go back to prison. "Now clean the damn fryer's like your freedom depended on it"

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 88 points 6 months ago

Don't keep her from customers. Let the Karen deal with the Karens. Poetic justice.

[-] Nepenthe@kbin.social 26 points 6 months ago

While it is funny, I don't think that the punishment for her in this article will really amount to much. If she had the kind of empathy necessary to relate that experience with what she put others through, she wouldn't have done it in the first place.

Whatever customers like herself that she comes across, I think it's a 50/50 whether she spends her time doing nothing but exacerbating problems and causing regular scenes or siding with "her people" and breaking rules, stealing, etc. out of spite.

Agree with MrShankles it has to be under threat of breaking probation to even work. Ultimately, she needs more reform than just receiving identical abuse in turn.

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 42 points 6 months ago

Lots of people only experience empathy for other people when they are directly involved or confronted with those people.

Like all those stories of homophobes who reform after learning a loved one is gay. They need their nose shoved in it before they could even picture someone elses viewpoint, but if you do that then they do empathize.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 5 points 6 months ago

Let the Karen deal with the Karens

It'll be like dragon ball, but with more screaming.

[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Prison for throwing food? Shitty behavior yes but wtf. She's got 4 kids too.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

It's battery, and the fact that she thought it was a reasonable course of action means that she needs to be given a bit more than a slap on the wrist fine.

I know people might say anger management therapy would be better, but these types of people will never admit that they were in the wrong in the first place. They'll twist things into a persecution complex.

Making her walk a mile in their shoes is an exceptionally good way to address this kind of behavior, and it's an alternative to jail time.

But, it's not like she would be given years in prison for it. It's basically like a forced timeout. Hell, even 2 weeks in jail might be enough to change things.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 4 points 6 months ago

She isn't going to prison. She is getting jail time. If she were that concerned about her 4 kids, she shouldn't go around assaulting fast food workers.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

If this is how she treats people she doesn't even know, how do you think she treats her kids?

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Many, many fast food restaurants are super short staffed because no one wants to do the job at the current market rate. If she actually tried she could find one in a day.

Also, fast food margins really aren't that tight.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

As long as this is only for this one case I'm ok with it, but I really don't want to see this become a trend to force people to work for these companies who are unwilling to pay willing workers a sufficient wage.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 5 points 6 months ago

It was an optional punishment that she chose over doing 90 days in jail. I don't fear it becoming a trend since most people don't assault fast food workers in the first place.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, but even as an optional punishment, and punishment for a crime shouldn't be made to benefit corporations.

[-] KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space 10 points 6 months ago

The article says she has yet to find the job.

Good luck finding someone to hire you for only two months as punishment for abuse. I'm sure they're scrambling for predetermined extremely short term employment from a toxic pile.

[-] OmenAtom@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Id guess working "fast food" in the commissary

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
1021 points (98.2% liked)

Not The Onion

11017 readers
65 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS