463
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by c0mmando@links.hackliberty.org to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

These are all the torrents currently managed and released by Anna’s Archive. For more information, see “Our projects” on the Datasets page. For Library Genesis and Sci-Hub torrents, the Libgen.li torrents page maintains an overview.

These torrents are not meant for downloading individual books. They are meant for long-term preservation.

Torrents with “aac” in the filename use the Anna’s Archive Containers format. Torrents that are crossed out have been superseded by newer torrents, for example because newer metadata has become available. Some torrents that have messages in their filename are “adopted torrents”, which is a perk of our top tier “Amazing Archivist” membership.

You can help out enormously by seeding torrents that are low on seeders. If everyone who reads this chips in, we can preserve these collections forever. This is the current breakdown:

Status Torrents Size Seeders
🔴 54 154.0TB <4
🟡 183 92.5TB 4–10
🟢 111 17.2TB >10

IMPORTANT: If you seed large amounts of our collection (50TB or more), please contact us at AnnaArchivist@proton.me so we can let you know when we deprecate any large torrents.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TCB13@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

These torrents are not meant for downloading individual books. They are meant for long-term preservation.

What does this mean? If download one of the those torrents it won't have usable PDFs/Epubs? Just random encoded garbage in some obscure format? So much for preservation. When their website is taken down and they'll in jail nobody will be able to use the torrents , so why seed them anyways?

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

The torrents are to preserve the archive as a whole and not individual books or documents. The entire archive is ~263TB's which is far more storage than most people have in their home. So instead they broke it up into bits that were more palatable for most that when combined make the whole again. Like a huge .rar from back in the day.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago

I hope you are wrong. A big multi-part archive can't normally be operated if any part is missing. I hope they do separate zips of a smaller size, like 100gb chunks of random books. By looking at one person's comment it seems the largest compilations are very unpopular.

[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 7 months ago

IME with libgen torrents, the filenames will be a random number-string generated by their database, and they might have extentions removed or garbled, but generally these files are actual eBooks/Articles/whatever.

[-] TCB13@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You're reciting their bullshit. I don't care about the size, what I care is that there's no documentation on the format they're using and nobody speaking about how to use those torrents.

Those guys made a lot with their website but that format is totally bullshit. If they truly cared about preservation they wouldn't be sharing obscure format s instead they would just provide a simple sharded backup of the metadata and files - meaning that anyone could pick one part and the contents would be the actual PDF/ePub files without any special encoding. This approach would've been better in multiple ways:

  1. If most parts are lost the remaining would still be available and usable;
  2. If the guys vanish from the surface of the planet anyone could easily pick up the available parts and build a new library from them;
  3. Simple sharded backup means that people could use those torrents to download books as well, just add the torrent and pick the specific file to download. This would make the torrents way more likely to be shared and seeded as most people could afford to keeps parts or specific books they want and not an entire 300GB torrent. For what's worth individualism and selfishness always win in society, giving people a usable sharded backup would make it more likely to last.

What I see is the the guys running the website are just asking people to share HDD space to keep their database intact in case of legal trouble so they can rebuilt, but they choose to do it in a way that makes it really hard for others to replicate what they've build from their files effectively creating a monopoly on their stuff. Too bad this behavior just fucks up the community if they go away and can't / don't want to come back.


Edit: let me even got further on this. If they were actually interested in preservation they would just provide all their files as individual torrents/magnets people could use both for downloading and seeding long term. Then they could just provide a file with a list of all magnets or a zip of all torrent files in order to allow seeders to preserve large chunks of the database with minimal effort - import all torrents in folder and done.

[-] c0mmando@links.hackliberty.org 10 points 7 months ago

of course it will.. but downloading 150 TB is overkill if you want one book

[-] TCB13@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

As if in 2023 you couldn't add a torrent and pick individual files to download from it instead of the entire thing.

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
463 points (96.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

52547 readers
301 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS