this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
118 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

16035 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 48 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Political non-euclidean??? Are they a fucking sphere?

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

topologically speaking i think they're a torus

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Hexagons@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I've thought about this a few times, but tbh I don't know enough about human anatomy to know! My main thing is, what about nostrils? Do nostrils increase the number of (topologically nontrivial) holes in a human? I think we can ignore the windpipe and lungs, there should be a homotopy removing them (I think). Same with eyeballs, vaginas, and whatnot. But nostrils? I think those might be topologically nontrivial.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

I was just making a joke about how many things are torus? Toruses? Tori?

Why have you been thinking about this

[–] Hexagons@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh! I forgot about ears! Really, the whole sinus situation is complicated and I have no idea what's happening in our weird-ass skulls

[–] AdlachGyfiawn@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

The outer ear ends at the eardrum, so I don't think it's topologically significant either. That said, the nostrils and mouth absolutely connect, so you have at least three holes up there.

I think we have five topologically significant holes? Nostrils, mouth, anus, urethra. Nothing else is actually a hole.

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

mouth-anus is one hole. nostrils and mouth form like a Y shape and i don't know enough math to name that kind of system

[–] AdlachGyfiawn@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sorry, I should've said we have five significant orifices. You're right that mouth-anus is one hole.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How do eye sockets fit into this? Aren't there openings between the skull and outside, technically, even though intraocular muscles or whatever usually keep the eye in an airtight position in the socket?

[–] AdlachGyfiawn@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Well, if we're saying that tissue blocking the way doesn't count, then we have a whooole lot of holes.

[–] Moss@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Nah I'm an Aquarius

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago
[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Step one: assume the centrist is a perfect sphere in a perfect vacuum

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Now calculate the volume of their ignorance using a triple integral in spherical coordinates

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Based on my understanding there's like a 60% chance it's either 1 or 0.

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

Oh I can think of some centrists I'd like to put inside a perfect vacuum

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

Infinitely dense

I think they mean they don’t identify themselves politically based on the political compass. Pretty nerdy way to say that, but it’s probably the most valid sentiment in that whole comment section.

that means they're a redditor

[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

How else are they going to stick their head so far up their ass?