this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
309 points (97.0% liked)

World News

39033 readers
677 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And we didn't fight it because the enemy were bad people. We fought it because we were attacked.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, we don't teach in us schools the isolationist position of ww2 or the war profiteering during both ww¹ and ww² while playing the isolationist.

[–] steltek@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Between the indiscriminate chemical weapons and the nepotistic generals ordering hundreds of thousands to their futile deaths, isolationism in WW1 was still probably the right idea.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sure but you'd have to actually be isolationist not war profiteers.

[–] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you saying barring Pearl Harbor the US would not have participated in WWII?

[–] steltek@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We were already participating in WW2 before Pearl Harbor. Lend-Lease was packing the UK chock full o' guns, food, and oil. The "Arsenal of Democracy" speech was 1940.