TechTakes

2752 readers

173 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems

Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 25th October 2026 (awful.systems)

submitted 5 days ago by BlueMonday1984@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

200 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just two weeks til' Halloween now.

Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The last slatestar was about AI successionism. As in, No no no, we're definitely not like those freaks who think humanity should just cede primacy to the first AI that shows us a bit of leg. Anyway here's how we should actually surrender to chatbots, cue rant about Kemal AI, how we could change the constitution so Claude can run for president, or have an AI legislator body were interested groups train their own AIs according to political preference and let them work it out between themselves, because politics and legislation are famously incredibly clear cut, no gray areas, no necessary compromises, no interpretability, no irrational actors, no incompatible agendas, everyone is pleased, make no mistakes.

He almost gives away the game when he says christians don't feel like slaves when they say 'thy will be done' so letting Claude run society would feel fine.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Article next to it is an anonymous review of Jünger's In Stahlgewitter, which is certainly A Choice.

(Jünger wasn't a card carrying Nazi, but served in the Wehrmacht in WW2 and is kind of a right-wing ideal of an aesthete)

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

Scott will literally...

Instead of reviewing a book by a woman.

[–] robjwells@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

Native English speakers might recognise it as Storm of Steel; for the unfamiliar it’s Jünger’s memoir of WWI and arguably a celebration of war.

Jünger’s an interesting character. He had different politics to the Nazis but it would be fair to call him a fascist in the period from 1918-45. After the war he revised some of his works to step away from some of his previous views, and had a big falling out with his private secretary Armin Mohler (an unrepentant fascist) over it. By the 1980s he was publicly denouncing the “ideology of war” contained in Storm of Steel.

If anyone is interested, I highly recommend the series on Mohler’s book The Conservative Revolution in Germany by the anti-fascist podcast The Empire Never Ended. First ep on YouTube. Jünger is discussed in the episode on the National Revolutionaries.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

how we could change the constitution so Claude can run for president

Did he forget Claude is owned by people? But yeah sure let corporations be president.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

He specifies Claude 10, so it's after the ??? in the checklist, and spicy autocomplete will be widely accepted to qualify for sentience by then I guess.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago

Sentient but still owned by Anthropic.

This is just slavery with extra steps!