Evinceo

joined 3 years ago
[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 4 points 22 hours ago

They recognize the groundswell of anti AI sentiment and want to try and channel it into AI booster action. Good luck with that.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Realistically a BSD

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm morbidly curious about how they're going to animate a doughnut. Is it going to wobble? Quiver? Oh god people are gonna, aren't they...

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

You can see the future first in San Francisco

🔮"I see a city street. Massive wealth disparity and a lot of homeless... Jesus that's a lot of homeless"

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's going to be really interesting to see if the foss zealots who switched over to the AI side will handle heavy handed regulation taking away their local models.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's full of knowledge I want but buried in lots of text I don't wanna read.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago
[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago

Good timing since it seems even Crypto folks are getting out of Crypto.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 3 points 2 months ago

Kevin Perjurer (not their real name)

Oh man I always wondered

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 5 points 2 months ago

The author is basically rationalizing and portraying sympathetically the way cops side with wealth and capital over the actual law.

It's techdirt what else do you expect?

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago

I'm waiting for someone to try this then they get black bagged and dragged to whatever event by someone who bet they would attend.

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 15 points 2 months ago

You show up, you put a ton of effort into a post, and at the end the comment section will tear apart some random thing that isn’t load bearing for your argument, isn’t something you consider particularly important, and whose discussion doesn’t illuminate what you are trying to communicate

Man if only LW posters knew how to use the delete key to shorten their posts to only the load bearing parts, which they consider particularly important and who's discussion illuminates what they were trying communicate. Alas.

 

I haven't read the whole thread yet, but so far the choice line is:

I like how you just dropped the “Vance is interested in right authoritarianism” like it’s a known fact to base your entire point on. Vance is the clearest demonstration of a libertarian the republicans have in high office. It’s an absurd ad hominem that you try to mask in your wall of text.

 

Utilitarian brainworms or one of the many very real instances of a homicidal parent going after their disabled child? I can't decide, but it's a depressing read.

May end up on SRD, but you read it here first.

 

Someone posted this on ssc with a warning about talking to cops, but really just marvel at what's going on here.

Aaronson manages to turn a story where he is briefly arrested for a theft (which he did commit on video!) into paragraphs and paragraphs of indulging in his persecution fantasies.

Zero empathy on display for the people he stole from, the people just doing their jobs, or reflection on the fact that it wasn't a simple little mistake anyone could make but rather... a fairly weird move? Do people usually put change in cups?

view more: next ›