If only the Russian Communists were more ruthless and thorough as the Chinese Communists.
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2026
111 points (99.1% liked)
Slop.
939 readers
407 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well, it pretty consistently means that the person is primarily sustaining themselves through growing crops. But the exact property relations will vary a lot by who, what, when, and where the term is being used.
I don't totally agree. I've always seen it used to refer to people who work land they themselves do not own, even if the specific relations between property owner and tenant has evolved over time. A farmer who owns the land they work is usually referred to as a Yeoman, or just a farmer, even if they are doing subsistence farming if they own the land they aren't a peasant.
That is one of these variations in the property relations in the definition. Usually yeomans are not considered peasants and peasants will be defined against them, but some will group them in to define them against another group (e.g. the urban buisness owners).