this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
119 points (97.6% liked)

politics

31220 readers
2393 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stoly@lemmy.world -5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

They already did twice. What do you want?

[–] Pratai@piefed.ca 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

We'll the first impeachment you had four centrists that voted against impeachment in various ways and had one centrist not only vote against it, they also switched to the Republican party.

[–] Pratai@piefed.ca 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 0 points 25 minutes ago

I'm terms of centrist not cocking up things? No, I can't say thay it went very well there.

I'm terms of the impeachment being successful and getting 55% approval and then having a record turnout in the 2020 election? Is day they were successful.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

The republicans refused to convict, twice. Democrats tried twice and it didn’t work. They will do it again and the senate will still not convict.

I’m really confused by the reasoning here and why people act like I’m saying something wrong. It’s almost like the democrats have to be punished extra because of the republicans being unwilling to hold trump to account.

[–] Pratai@piefed.ca 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

The point is, impeachment doesn’t do shit. No one will convict him. How much proof do you need to finally come to terms with the fact that he and his foreign handlers fucking own America.

It’s over dude. There wil be no reckoning. He will never face justice. Just accept it.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I have always believed that there will be no justice. The question was about whether democrats would impeach and that has been the only thing i have responded to.

[–] Pratai@piefed.ca 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn’t really matter. There’s your answer.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

You’re projecting your nihilism something fierce and genuinely being a dick to others because of how you feel right this moment.

[–] Pratai@piefed.ca 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s not nihilism. It’s being a realist. I don’t live in the world I wish existed. I live in the one that is evidence-based and empirical.

And for the record: there’s an entire psychology on how realism is often mistaken as pessimism. It’s pretty interesting shit.

And what you think is “being a dick” is merely me defending my point against people that don’t seem to understand it enough to attack it.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Nah dude. You think nothing matters and lay the attack on people who point out things they literally happened because you don’t think they matter. This is all about your personal emotional dysregulation.

[–] Pratai@piefed.ca 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Oh how awesome! I was wondering where my biographer was! Please… do tell me more about how I am and what I think! And If you could, please let me know when the book is finished. I’d love a copy!

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You’re toxic and are getting a block.

[–] Pratai@piefed.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Some gifts just wrap themselves it seems.

[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Then you want to talk to the Republicans. Because unless the Senate goes like 60% Democrat and the coalition votes to convict, there's nothing they can do to secure a conviction.

[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah... There is so much more they could do (which I mentioned).

But the whole campaign strategy is to court MAGAs and conservatives while pissing on the progressive left. This means that they won't do anything. They are also all AIPAC so, they won't do it because of that either.

They could hold up procedures and other government functions in protest, (like tooberville did with military promotions), they don't ever do anything.