this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2026
43 points (100.0% liked)

Ethnic Minorities and People of Color

1658 readers
24 users here now

Official Title of this Community: Ethnic Minorities and People of Color

Why is the title different?

We like to have fun here.

What is this place? A safe space for underrepresented peoples and peoples of color to talk, chill, and vibe.

What are the basic rules of the community?

  1. Follow Lemmy TOS and Community Guidelines. Non negotiable. This is the bedrock and mods will make decisions with this always in mind.

  2. This community is for ethnic minorities and people of color. This is a safe space where such people can freely discuss their struggles, insight, and thoughts without fear. If you are not, we respectfully ask you do not post or comment here. A future community will be established to allow for racial discussions with a mixed userbase. However, remember, comments here must still respect Lemmy TOS and Community Guidelines.

  3. Irony Racism is still racism. Racism is bad m'kay? We will treat irony racism and bad faith racist satire as racism. Will wield the ban hammer accordingly.

  4. No sectarianism: This is an identity channel not a channel for you all to complain about why XYZ isn't the "one true leftism". Take that to another place.

  5. Stupidpol is not allowed. Stupidpol is class reductionist. We are an identity community. Thinking like stupidpol ignores the struggles of the oppressed, their voices, and their need for unique support. Nothing says oppression more than someone saying that the identity you have is "not real" and that if you only thought like them you'd see what your "real" identity is. Mods reserve the right to ban users and content who promote stupidpol, stupidpol memes, and other class reductionist thinking.

FAQ

I don't look XYZ and/or sometimes I can pass as white so I don't know if I can post here. Can I?

What can I post?

Suggested Posts

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Treaty of Fort Jackson (also known as the Treaty with the Creeks) was signed on this day in 1814 at Fort Jackson in Alabama. The treaty was agreed upon in the aftermath of the defeat of Red Stick (Upper Creek) resistance by U.S. forces at the Battle of Horseshoe Bend.

The treaty was the "largest single Indian cession of southern American land", according to historian Michael Rogin - around 23 million acres in Alabama and Georgia. The U.S. forces won with the battle with the help of allied Cherokee and Lower Creek forces friendly to the American side.

The terms of various treaties with the Creek nation would go on to be consistently violated by Americans colonizing the south.

I hope you nerds have a good month of August cuddle

Remember no crackers

anti-cracker-aktionqin-shi-huangdi-fireball

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Angel@hexbear.net 10 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

You know, to link this to what we discussed about gender a bit below in this thread, I find it fascinating how I've seen so many leftists on this site willing to call out Hasan for misogyny but never at all seeming to push back on him enabling Zionism, especially when it's in the liberal form. This proves the point that white leftists tend to always think that every other contradiction matters more than the contradictions pertaining to race, imperialism, and colonial violence. Hasan making objectifying comments towards women is bad, of course, no doubt, but why is that treated as more of a moral emergency than the man devoting much of his time and energy on his hugely popular platform giving rhetorical validation to settlers (and supporters of these settlers) who are murdering a shit-ton of brown people and stealing their homes right now? They don't view Black and Brown people and those in the global south as people.

white leftists tend to always think that every other contradiction matters more than the contradictions pertaining to race, imperialism, and colonial violence

For years I've run into people who think that my centering of imperial violence as the most important thing is some weird quirk rather than a strong moral position based on a real assessment of violence. I have despaired of getting across to people at this point, because anyone who acknowledges material reality will independently come to the same conclusions I have.