this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
31 points (86.0% liked)
science
28617 readers
480 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
dart board;; science bs
rule #1: be kind
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
WTF: Let economists control and study your trip? Surprised it's only 1 in 8 bad trips (which is worse than normal). Not for me, and yeah it's right there in the abstract, 200x financial gain. FU.
Otherwise unsurprising, psychedelics help depression and neuronal plasticity, shocker.
They were not present. The ceremonies were conducted by a center in Brazil that receives over 1400 people per year. I meant to say that the data and analysis were coordinated and published by a group of economists.
Thanks for that, the thought was awful. Blessed be :)
“A commercial center that receives 1400 tourists per year.”
An intimate spiritual retreat just like the ancient shamans intended it.
The cost is 20 dollars. It's basically for free.
Its not really about the money, just that “life changing psychedelic experience” is being turned into a commercial commodity.
I do understand it, the tourism was already happening, shamans in high demand. Might as well streamline the experience.
It just feels wrong though.
This is from Wikipedia:
At the same time, even in ancient African religions like the Yoruba, payment is necessary for a shaman to conduct a ceremony, as the exchange of value is an intrisical part of the ceremony.
These ceremonies in Brazil are non profit and the payment is a donation and is often waived.
Research the most popular groups like Santo Daime, Uniao Vegetal and the Universalists (the ones in the article).
You can tell it's an econ study when the premise is pointless, the experiment is pseudo-science, and the results are worthless.
Eh, valid, but the results were interesting. I mean I prefer double blind procedures, but good science can be done without.