Progressive Politics

4888 readers

142 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

TokenBoomer@lemmy.world

470

Cut Off by Your Adult Child? Fox News Has Answers (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 days ago by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BenVimes@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Grandparents' rights are not what many people seem think they are. It's not a court ordering a couple to let estranged/toxic grandparents have access to their grandkids above the objections of the parents.

Rather, it is adjusting custody arrangements during separation/divorce so that grandparents can maintain an existing relationship wth their grandkids. For example, if a couple is separating and the mother gains primary custody, the father's parents can apply to get visitation rights with the kids. It's not automatic, as they would have to meet the burden of, "in the best interest of the children," to the satisfaction of the judge.

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, but this is my understanding of the issue from reading discussions and papers (including the one linked in another post in this thread).

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In my jurisdiction I think that's only partially true.

Firstly, it's also true here that the outcome needs to be "in the best interest of the child", and that's critical.

However, it's not only cases where the child's parents have had a relationship breakdown, but is applicable to cases where the child's parents are estranged from the grandparents:

Sometimes grandparents are prevented from having a relationship with their grandchildren. This can happen where the relationship with their own child has broken down (but the parents’ relationship remains intact), or where the parents have separated and one parent refuses to let them see their grandchildren. Grandparents do not have an automatic right to have a relationship with a grandchild. However, grandparents, and anyone who has an ongoing relationship with the child, or any other person who can show that they are concerned with the care, welfare or development of a child (including grandparents) can apply to the court for parenting orders.

https://www.legalaid.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/inline-files/Grandparents_family_law.PDF

So it's not a law that would regularly enable grandparents to corrupt children against the wishes of the child's parents.

Additionally, I suspect that parenting orders may be able to require supervised access, or restrict them from participating in religious ceremonies and that kind of thing.

[–] BenVimes@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Right, I'm mostly familiar with Canada (my own country) and the USA (by cultural osmosis).

Still, the legal burden on the grandparents to get access to their grandkids seems sufficiently high. It's far cry from the idea many people seem to have of grandparents' rights, i.e. the right of the grandparenta to see their grandkids supercedes that of the parents to control who the kids interact with.