843
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

Amazing that the founding fathers didn't contemplate the possibility of a felon under active lawsuits becoming speaker

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 29 points 9 months ago

In defense of the founding fathers, they were all traitors to the crown and enemies of the state when they wrote that.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Possibly they were young and drunk too.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They also sold drugs, ran guns, and said fuck the law. This documentary touches on it.

https://youtu.be/ABhyKEK-CDg?si=5g1fbVMMqLtoJoSR

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Boys will be boys

[-] Varixable@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 9 months ago

They probably didn't contemplate having an active child Diddler be speaker from 1987-2007 either, but Republicans sure love their historic firsts.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

The founding fathers were amazingly shit at game theory.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

Considering no one would formalize game theory for 150 years it's not particularly surprising.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

You don't need to necessarily formalize game theory to consider things like: hey, we just gave the president the authority to pardon. Couldn't they abuse that? What if they pardon someone who was doing something illegal that they ordered? What if they commit a crime and pardon themselves?

I mean, that's the most obvious one that you don't really need formal game theory to know could be a problem. Then there are all the other problems. Checks and balances are good, but when a powerful faction uses its power to put loyalists into the thing that's supposed to balance them, the system seems to unravel.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 9 months ago

They didn't even contemplate the House Speaker being in the Presidential line of succession. Which is the reason they want to put Trump there. Not that it would work; they'd have to remove both the President and Vice President at the same time, and the Senate ain't going to do that.

[-] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

An angry mob with strong will to unalive certain people before the #3 in the line of succession would be a major concern

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
843 points (98.2% liked)

News

21695 readers
2951 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS