politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Now what? So it's just chaos for the rest of the session?
In contrast to the order and dignity that prevailed until now?
I was honestly yuge impressed she knew such a bigly word.
I did some reading up on this, and there is a difference between the situations now and January. Back in January, the House couldn't formally start anything for the new Congress until the Speaker was elected. So no committees could be established, no hearings could be held, and new members couldn't even be sworn in.
But now, all that stuff has happened, so technically committees can still hold hearings. But when the whole House is in session, the only thing they can consider is the Speaker election.
If this goes on for a few days, I wonder if any Republicans will have the chutzpah to hold those Biden Impeachment hearings while they still can't yet decide on a Speaker....
It’ll go on until some legislation that gives a big break to billionaires needs to move forward in the house, and then all the GOP lickspittles will snap into line faster than they can cash a campaign finance check.
Yes. They will absolutely hold hearings to “own the libs” if they have any option to. It gives them something to pivot to when asked questions that they don’t want to answer (pretty much EVERY question these days).
So what does this mean Wrt the shutdown? No discussion can happen? And if there's no new speaker in 43 days is there an automatic shutdown?
Committees can still meet, and it's possible that new budget legislation can be drafted, but it will halt once it gets out of committee, because the whole House can't take any action until it has a Speaker again.
Can the speaker pro tempore preside? I’m not sure I’ve seen a good resource on that (or who is third in line for the presidency).
But how the hearings can be scheduled if there is no speaker?
Because the hearings are scheduled by the committee chairs, and the committees are still functioning. It's only the full House sessions that are stuck.
No. There is the Speaker Pro Temp. They'll run the chamber until a new vote. Speaker votes don't need to happen any time soon either. Unlike the start of the term, the members are already sworn in and can go about regular business.
The current Pro Temp is a McCarthy ally who was in the debt ceiling negotiations. So we'll probably see the same as what McCarthy would be doing.
To give an idea of what to expect, the Pro Temp Speaker's first action after graveling out like he was swinging Mjolnir was to evict Nancy Pelosi from her office despite the fact that she's in California attending Feinstein's funeral.
Damn. The level of petty.
Pretty much.
That would be different from the norm how exactly?