this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
311 points (91.2% liked)
196
6555 readers
1669 users here now
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you find yourself getting real worked up about tankies or anarchists, then respectfully, go touch some fucking grass. There's real comrades (of a variety of tendencies) out there, fighting against actual (and ascendent) fascism. Your ideological grudges are so fuckin stupid and irrelevant at this point in history. Seriously. Not. Worth. A. Fucking. Mention. Work together when you can, wish them luck when you can't.
I used to say this stuff about needing to come together and all. Then I worked with people who called themselves "comrades" until it became obvious I'd been used by awful people who wanted power and who saw hurting others as an unfortunate necessity or even a perk of the job. Then I started paying attention.
It's not a matter of historical grudges, it's a question of who we're propping into power. Arguably less important than avoiding fascism but still very much worth some discusssion.
You had a bad experience with some people, and have made up your mind about a whole political philosophy? Of course there's asshole communists that are unpleasant to work with. I absolutely cannot believe that you've never had similar experience with anarchists. I certainly have, but it hasn't made me write off anarchism, it just made me write off working with those specific people.
The point in anarchism is that nobody can be trusted to have coercive power over others, because there's always that one dipshit who will seek that position of power for selfish ends, or then the position of power corrupts a person to become a dipshit.
Dipshit anarchists aren't a problem in that sense because they never get into a hierarchical position of power because there are none.
I have absolutely seen power dynamics in anarchist spaces. Nobody is making you work with anyone. I have removed myself from communist and anarchist organizing in the past because I wasn't vibing with one thing or another. Reducing (or writing off) individuals to their tendency isn't productive. I'm not asking anarchists to become communists or vice versa, I'm just asking for us to work together where we can.
Interpersonal dynamics are impossible avoid and charismatic people are difficult to deal with in this regard, yes, but those should be easier to address than when there's institutional structures propping up the dipshit in question.
I'm not against cooperation with more hierarchically structured factions, just explaining my interpretation of what falcunculus was talking about. Like them, I'm also quite wary of the prospect of replacing our current dipshit overlords only to end up with a different dipshit waving a red flag.
How likely do you think it is that we'll have communist leadership, or broad anarchy in your lifetime? We are fighting for survival and the fascists are painting targets on all of us. I beg you to keep your focus on the present situation when deciding who you will or won't work with.
As I said, I’m not against cooperation with more hierarchically structured factions.
And to answer your question: I won't pretend to know. With the current wave of fascism, we might end up with a thousand year reich, or then it crashes and burns and the swing goes the other way real fast. Or maybe nothing happens and capitalism just reinvents itself yet again to sputter along for however long it can (at this rate a century at most).
Well I had a bad experience, which made me research the history of the party I was in, and its predecessors, and the underlying ideology; and I found leninism and its branches (ML, trotskyism, maoism, etc) hold as a core tenet that there is a small group of people (the vanguard) who must have absolute uncontested authority over all others and must eliminate all contestation. Regardless of whether you believe that ideology by itself is justifiable, it has historically been used over and over as a rhetorical hammer to justify and fortify the power of power-hungry individuals (this is also true of other marxist branches, even beginning with Marx himself). I learnt "co-secretary" means supreme leader, "materialism" means trust me bro, "democratic centralism" means shut the fuck up, and "petty-bourgeois" means you are a bad person regardless of your actual deeds or social situation.
I also realized that the party sociology was deeply divided, with the upper ranks being political science graduates who were planning a career within the system while the lower ranks thought they were fighting against the system. Votes were a masquerade in which the upper ranks decided what the best outcome would be before discussing how it could be passed — there was absolutely no belief in any "collective wisdom", only shepherds looking to guide their flock. None of this is part of leninist doctrine, but the social split and patriarchal outlook absolutely were characteristic of Lenin's party — and is it a wonder that technocrats who look down on the common people would be attracted to an ideology that promotes there being a small cadre of very smart people who should yield absolute power over the rest of them?
All this sounds a bit naive of me; I sort of knew about this stuff before joining, but I didn't really think it could happen to me, you know? I thought 1920s USSR had little in common with my life, and I just wanted to support some leftist organization that had at least some bite and radical character. I wouldn't have though it necessary to read all these books and articles on the subject beforehand. Probably had I read them before, I wouldn't really have grokked them anyway.
So yes I do believe at the very least leninism is fundamentally rotten. Revolutionary leninist parties turn into sects, electoral leninist parties turn into alternate career paths for the social-conscious lower managerial class. I also regard marxism as a mere historical artifact due to its keystone (materialist dialectics) being pseudoscience that can be used to claim or explain anything and glaring omissions in its social analysis. I do think "post-marxist" thought can be very interesting though; that is, thought that is in line with marxist lineage but deconstructing parts of the marxist orthodoxy.
And I wouldn't write off a person based on the organization they find themselves in, since many people just want to help and find themselves in one organization or another based on luck. I'm sure many left-anarchists are assholes but I don't think we'll ever see a dictatorship that uses left-anarchism as its ideological underpinnings, for obvious reasons.
That's a suspiciously long reply for someone who's not a communist ;)
Lol I guess I just like blathering
Ok tankie