this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
318 points (93.7% liked)

Games

50323 readers
201 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world 154 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I just wanna say this is my opinion.

98% of the shit we deal with. Not just game shit, but everything....all boils down to these folks with power being utter rotten puss filled cunts.

Like honestly. Fuck disc. I hate em. I love digital. But fuck me. Let it be mine. Let me mod it (without cheating in it) let me play it on any console I want. Let it be my $80 of the game to do with as I want.

Like stop being such assholes. Why do these folks gotta turn into hateful cunts cause they got money or they made a game or media or whatever the fuck.

Consumers wouldn't be as pissed if they weren't being fisted constantly.

[–] leave_it_blank@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (37 children)

That's why I love gog, and it's the only store that gets my gaming money. The games are mine, as long as I keep a backup of the installer. I can do with them what I want.

I see why the newest AAA games are a must have for younger gamers, but as an older one I now have the patience to simply wait until it releases on gog if I actually have the urge to play it.

Digital is fantastic, I miss the boxes and handbooks and feelies, but I don't miss the discs.

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

Other stores have DRM free games too. For example Cyberpunk 2077 is DRM free on Steam. DRM, for the most part, is forced by publishers rather than stores.

https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/List_of_DRM-free_games

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can do that with Steam games too. The ones without DRM.

And it's the developer that chooses if they want DRM.

[–] creamfresh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well can you see beforehand which game uses Steam DRM? And I still need the client installed to download anything, and even then I only archive the actual game, not any dependency.

[–] craig_morton@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago

The steam store itself doesn't show if a game uses Steam-DRM (which is a buncha bullshit if you ask me) but the PCGamingWiki usually has that information.

[–] BruisedMoose@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

feelies

You are sufficiently old. Good job.

I always wanted Wishbringer SO BAD because it came with that damn rock.

[–] Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Hell yeah. Love GOG.

But for me, while I love old games, I need my new shit lol.

Like bf6 has been a gem for me. Some bugs and bullshit, but I do like it. Which, call me stupid for this but bf6 and modern battle/war games are a bit of therapy for me. I joined the Marines, got to last week of basic training, came back from team(?) Week and was told to get my shit on the front deck or whatever. Ended up I had hep c. Paperwork fell through and it wasn't caught till I was almost done

And grant you, I wanted to "fight for America and the people in it" since I was like 7. I was 20 just outta h.s. It tore my world apart. Had to do meds and all that. Pills and injection.

Anyways. Games like battlefield or even the more serious ones like Insurgency helped me use some of the stuff I learned on my own over the years and stuff in basic to not feel like it was all a huge waste of my life.

Tl"dr I enjoy modern fps games because they help me deal with my trauma in life.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Let it be my ~~$80~~ $59,99 of the game to do with as I want.

Never forget, never forgive.

[–] charokol@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Nintendo 64 games cost like $60-$80 back in the late 90s.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They were also complicated circuit boards with full color manuals and box graphics, none of which is in digital nor the overhead of the creation thereof.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

And they could not be patched later, so the testing was absolutely bonkers.

[–] hawgietonight@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The perceived value back then was not having to pluck down 25c every time you played at the arcade. So even if the price was high it seemed cheap in the long run.

Editt : reading it again I've missed my point by a decade, this applies mostly to the late 80s

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they also didn’t sell nearly as many copies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 3 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Yeah fair it is arbitrary, but the line in the sand must be drawn somewhere. So coming from PC platform and 59,99 being the agreed upon number for probably decade or more is a good enough arbitrary point to use as a line in the sand.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There shouldn't be an arbitrary "line in the sand" for games. Just like there shouldn't be for any other product. Because products are not all the same. Some games might take an hour to beat and others have endless replayability and it shouldn't be expected that these all cost the same.

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

No, there most definitely should, there should be a line or set point for everything. A point from which onward one no longer accepts any further abuse.

Yes sure we can have discussion on where that line stands with gaming, like "no preorders" or "no p2w", but there most definitely should be one or even multiple different ones and that should be upheld or else we do get current climate of AAA games riddled with mtx, psychological manipulation, getting more expensive yearly, no longer any long term guarantees either, while gameplay, story and performance quality dropping as well.

Without a set point or line, corporations wil keep on pushing the boundaries every single year as we keep allowing it.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’d pay $150 for a great finished game. They don’t make that anymore, and you can’t make anything good and sell it for $60. So I’m not sure what you people want?! You want these companies to spend 3 billion making a game, making it perfect, and charging only $60 for it. Insane. No wonder why gamers get treated like entitled complainers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A point from which onward one no longer accepts any further abuse.

A higher price does not mean abuse. It very well could just mean its a higher quality game with more content.

or else we do get current climate of AAA games riddled with mtx, psychological manipulation, getting more expensive yearly, no longer any long term guarantees either, while gameplay, story and performance quality dropping as well.

How does a low price stop that from happening? If anything it's the opposite.

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I wouldn't really use 60$ as a low price, but that's beside the point.

Your missing the trees for the forest. It's not the low price, but setting a line which one does not cross.

Not having that line and constantly accepting every subsequent new mechanic to extract more profit from us has resulted in the current state of AAA gaming industry.

As i said we can discuss where that line runs, 60$ is just my own personal line, but that line, not specifically price, should exist and should not be crossed. Id agree with the "no pre-orders" as well as games should be only bought after independent thrid party reviews have gone out. Just that this line doesn't fit into current context, this one fits better under a post of a releasing of a new highly anticipated game.

Though where would you draw the line?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If the game is honestly updated with effort and hard work I will pay $80.

I clean air bnbs, houses, condos, and all that for a living. I don't do shit for less than $100.

I get folks gotta eat. But if you want my money for your product, it better be that good dick shit. It better be high quality and ducking finished. Not this "oh here's we got updates coming, the game is has a roadmap."

Like motherfucker the game can't drive it doesn't need a road map, it's need to be finished.

Wanna release the unfinished version? $20. But give me user support, working graphics, good multi if it's that game, all the bells and whistles and I'll pay $80 if you show me you goddamn actually care for the thing you are making.

Show me the love for your product/art/work and I will gladly give you money to support you for doing something you care about. And I mean even the ceos. Have some goddamn integrity and humility for fucking once.

Sorry to rant.

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 4 points 1 month ago

No need to apologize for ranting, rant on.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was $50 before that and as high as $90 before that. $60 is kind of arbitrary, honestly.

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, but it suffices as a line in the sand. We could probably use horse armor as well, but that's even more arbitrary and there are few publisher who have managed to keep mtx based market under control and run a free successful game for years, ex POE.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

$60 in 2007 is a bit under $100 now in terms of purchasing power. Games have essentially gone down in price.

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, but that's just finding justifications for publisher who use every possible opportunity to screw us over at every opportunity while delivering shittier products every year.

No need to run free PR for them, corpos have whole departments for that. Fuck em, use the same mentality corpos use towards us, show them no mercy or forgiveness. Treat corpos with the contempt they deserve. We are the ones who have to exert the counter force, not just accept whatever they throw at us.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Why would you ever buy anything from a corporation like that?! They aren’t selling you food. This is pathetic. Gamers are pathetic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

On console, digital only means the only market is them. That's why this is happening, and it's the real issue. The ownership thing is an issue too, but that's been dead for a while, even with physical disks. Very few games worked with only the disk install and no internet, so the disk doesn't let you play without their support anyway.

I've been PC only for a long time now, so I'm fine with digital only. On PC we have some choice of marketplace. Sure, (I'm probably going to get flammed for pointing this out) Valve has used their market dominance to force price parity, but it's still better than consoles. Console players are about to get fucked, and they're probably going to turn around and thank them for it.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There’s nothing wrong with getting fisted.

[–] Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

No, I love fisting. But with consent.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Because people with money have the time and patience to arrange an eloquent argument to legislators.

Easy, and correct, to say “But a lot of those guys are bought and paid for.” They are, but they also need to convince the gullible representatives; the ones that want to think they’re doing the right thing, and will vote yes anytime a bill has “For Children” in the name.

But senators aren’t convinced by “Like stop being such assholes.” They need a mature, well-arranged argument that demonstrates unfairness and harm. SKG showed when it’s well-described, it can have effects.

load more comments (1 replies)