this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
241 points (97.3% liked)

Fuck AI

8012 readers
2165 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just launched: https://noailist.org/ - support projects that don't use AI. This is a website that will be a list of projects that have specifically chosen not to use AI. Submit your project today.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stuartml@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Any sources could help direct the future of the project

[–] derbolle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

could you specify what exactly you mean by that? i don't understand your reply, sorry about that

[–] stuartml@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Sure, ghost may be listed as dirty on that website, but there are no links to actual evidence, despite it being listed as cited, if there are credible citations I would consider building this project away from ghost.

[–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago

Soooo, if there are no sources for it why is it labeled dirty? Can I just go in and label everything in existence as dirty and then it's on others to make the effort to defend it?

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Is telling new hires they will get access to the latest AI tools acceptable as evidence? "💻 Hardware A brand new MacBook Pro + a budget for office setup and the latest AI tools."

https://careers.ghost.org/staff-product-engineer/en This is the first entry for Ghost.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I also thought their weren't sources on that site a few days ago.

Click on "view citation" now click on the very small text up next to or just below the date. Its not very obvious.

[–] stuartml@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The view citation has no supporting evidence.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let's take Ghost as an example. Click on the first entry's "view citation" button. Now click on the red circle as shown in the picture.

[–] stuartml@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Thanks for taking the time to do this, why hide the source link so badly? I did read their page, and it does say the quoted text. Due to this, I will be considering moving away from using Ghost, firstly I will contact Ghost to see what their stance is.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

No worries. Plenty of Lemmy users helped me with this a couple days ago. It felt right to pay it forward.

[–] derbolle@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

sorry for not answering, I kinda forgot. good, that this has been answered nonetheless.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Build it with Fable 🤷‍♂️