this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
398 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck AI

7606 readers
1543 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In March, a girl’s stepfather took his own life after cops discovered that he had used Grok to create 7,000 sexually explicit images using one photo taken when his stepdaughter was 11 years old, the amended complaint alleged.

Grok allowed the man to generate extreme images depicting incest and rape without flagging any harmful behavior, the complaint said. Seemingly, xAI’s child safety system only intervened after the man input a prompt for “gang rape.” That request sent a CyberTip to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), which alerted law enforcement to the AI CSAM.

Yet the harm was not stopped then, either. Despite mandatory reporting requirements to share information like a user’s IP address when CSAM is flagged, xAI repeatedly refused to help cops or NCMEC identify the user, the complaint alleged. For weeks, xAI allegedly “obstructed this investigation at every turn” and made it harder for “law enforcement efforts to locate, identify, and apprehend the perpetrator.”

Eventually, the stepfather was arrested after cops obtained a warrant to seize his devices. That’s when “a forensic review revealed approximately 7,000 AI-generated images and videos” depicting his stepdaughter, which were allegedly produced using Grok. Without Grok providing users with easy access to “undressing” capabilities, his family doubts he ever would have generated the harmful images, which he allegedly trafficked online in trade for “CSAM produced by other child sex predators.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What kind of community support do you offer a person who needs external help to not sexually assault children? How the fuck do you welcome a person like that into a community? They will be a constant threat.

That's not to say all pedophiles are dangerous. I'm sure there's many people with that issue who just keep it to themselves and probably feel terrible about it, but these comments about them needing an outlet? Fuck no, they shouldn't be entertaining those kinds of thoughts at all, even as a fantasy.

[–] christian@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

You don't welcome someone who is currently dangerous. My point is that a person who is facing an entire lifetime of self-loathing in silence is more likely to eventually become a threat years down the road. Most people feel a need to get things off their chest after a long enough time hurting quietly, and someone in that position will be much more likely to turn into a predator if the only people they feel safe opening up to are other pedophiles. You can call opening up to someone who can give them healthy perspectives "an outlet", but I think it would be less harmful than repression. I'd rather they try to get help and have other people aware of the issue.

Realistically there's no magic wand to solve this, but I do believe that pushing people who are not predators underground is much more dangerous than looking at it as an illness that deserves support in mitigating.