this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
392 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

16120 readers
611 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/34370513

Anon likes bikes

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 29 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Yes, actually:

(Besides a 'velomobile', anyway ... which is basically just a bicycle with bodywork for better aerodynamics.)

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Death sentence to whoever chose to animate a fake scatter plot over this thing. And yeah velomobiles are just speed-optimized bicycles.

[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Finally a graph that dares to compare cows and jet fighters!

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 8 points 2 days ago

Probably not the only graph that does so. Both are relevant sources of greenhouse gas emissions as well, so they probably share some graphs on the topic of climate change.

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Mice should be ashamed of their inefficiency.

[–] buffing_lecturer@leminal.space 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is so cool. Why do I intuitively expect the efficiency should increase with the Y axis instead through? It feels somewhat upside down?

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

The Y axis is cost of transport, low cost = high efficiency.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

Velomobile looks like fun but they cost so much. Seems like they are typically custom built and use carbon fibre. So several thousand or more. Meanwhile my bike was like £600.

Now if we could just get a salmon on a velomobile

[–] tuxiqae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I assume that the main upside of a velomobile is removing the un-aerodynamicality of the human on it

Which makes me wonder whether a bike without a biker will be more aerodynamic than a velomobile

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

curious where lighter than air vehicles and trains end up on there

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Blimp efficiency depends on size, a big one would be on the bottom right. But then some wind would send it tumbling around and it would crash into Jet transport and Horse, rapidly disintegrating as it pulverizes Human on a velomobile against the bottom axis.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Same as sailing ships I suppose, if you are just using the wind like a hot air balloon anyway.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It would be very difficult to measure how much energy (in calories) a sailing ship is using in order to move.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The notion of "fuel efficiency" kinda stops making sense for a sailboat.