this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
-1 points (42.9% liked)

Asklemmy

54927 readers
169 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm in the US and as we all know they're definitely planning on using ICE at the polling booths for voter intimidation. I look quite democrat/liberal (long hair, below average body hair, slightly chubby with low muscle, straight teeth) so I'll probably be a target for it. I've been thinking of dressing up as a Republican so I'll be less likely to be targeted. I don't wanna scare people or get in trouble so I'm not going to do something as obvious as wearing a Confederate flag. I also can't change my appearance that much so I don't get flagged for my ID. What I do to look like a Republican without scaring others or getting in trouble?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If voting is the democratic participation in our own oppression, voting as harm reduction is a politics that keeps us at the mercy of our oppressors.

While so many on the left–including some Indigenous radicals–are concerned with consolidation of power into fascists hands, they fail to recognize how colonial power is already consolidated. There is nothing intersectional about participating in and maintaining a genocidal political system. There’s no meaningful solidarity to be found in a politics that urges us to meet our oppressors where they’re at. Voting as harm reduction imposes a false solidarity upon those identified to be most vulnerable to harmful political policies and actions. In practice it plays out as paternalistic identity politicking as liberals work to identify the least dangerous candidates and rally to support their campaigns. The logic of voting as harm reduction asserts that whoever is facing the most harm will gain the most protection by the least dangerous denominator in a violently authoritarian system. This settler-colonial naivety places more people, non-human beings, and land at risk then otherwise. Most typically the same liberal activists that claim voting is harm reduction are found denouncing and attempting to suppress militant direct actions and sabotage as acts that “only harm our movement.” “Voting as harm reduction” is the pacifying language of those who police movements. Voting as harm reduction is the government issued blanket of the democratic party, we’re either going to sleep or die in it.

To organize from a position that voting is an act of damage limitation blurs lines of the harm that settler and resource colonialism imposes. Under colonial occupation all power operates through violence. There is absolutely nothing “less harmful” about participating in and perpetuating the political power of occupying forces. Voting won’t undue settler colonialism, white supremacy, hetero-patriarchy, or capitalism. Voting is not a strategy for decolonization. The entire process that arrived at the “Native vote” was an imposition of U.S. political identity on Indigenous Peoples fueled by white supremacy and facilitated by capitalism.

Voting is Not Harm Reduction: An Indigenous Perspective, emphasis mine.

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not voting because it's not a good harm reduction strategy is just another way of saying it won't do any good so don't bother.

If you are trying to present a nuanced argument against some specific reason 'for' voting, more power to you, but you are seriously coming across as a worthless bot put in place to recommend not voting wherever possible.

just another way of saying it won't do any good so don't bother

Yes I literally am trying to say that. Like why the fuck should I vote if it won't do any good? Why should I do anything in the whole wide world if it won't do any good?

you are seriously coming across as a worthless bot

I'd rather "come across" as a bot than be a selectively born-yesterday shitlib. Anarchists and other revolutionary socialists have been saying this message for a hundred years since before the Internet was a thing, and it's never been more valid than it is now.

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Still, go out and vote