this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
251 points (99.2% liked)

World News

56875 readers
1576 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Don't worry, the billionaires will always have A/C

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Valuy@lemmy.zip 74 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)

No one is more responsible for this mess than this guy.

Rupert Murdoch.

The largest media mogul in the English speaking world. He owns Fox News. He owns The UK Sun. He owns the New York Post. He owns The Wall Street Journal. He owns 90% of the Australian press.

He urged the British people to support Brexit:

(She never said of this)

Rupert Murdoch has used his immense influence to spread climate change denial. Fox News has denied climate change for decades. It's pure disinformation.

From January through June 2019, Fox News Network programs mentioned climate change or global warming 391 times, which amounts to roughly 65 mentions per month.

Of the 247 segments, 212 or 86% were dismissive of the climate crisis, cast warming and its consequences in doubt or employed fear mongering when discussing climate solutions.

https://www.citizen.org/news/climate-change-denial-dominates-86-of-fox-news-climate-segments/

According to a recent study, Republicans trust Fox News than any other news source:

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/07/17/6-facts-about-fox-news/

Republicans make up half the United States. They trust Fox News more than any other media organization. Let that sink in.

The Wall Street Journal is also a major problem.

I mean look at this shit:

There's no compelling scientific argument for drastic action to 'decarbonize' the world's economy.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204301404577171531838421366

Climate Science is not settled

https://www.wsj.com/articles/climate-science-is-not-settled-1411143565

Global warming doesn't matter. Contrary to the latest news, the evidence that global warming will have serious effects is thin.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB119258265537661384

The Climate-Change Religion

President Obama wrote in his proclamation for Earth Day on Wednesday. “As a Nation, we must act before it is too late.”

Obama and his supporters are wrong. There is no reason to act.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-climate-change-religion-1429832149

No, climate change has not caused an increase in the frequency or intensity of floods, droughts, hurricanes and tornadoes. This is a false claim.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/notable-quotable-climate-change-and-war-1461021491

What is the origin of the false belief — constantly repeated — that almost all scientists agree about global warming?

There is actually no scientific consensus on global warming

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303480304579578462813553136

The Guardian, The New York Times or The Financial Times would never publish such garbage. But the Wall Street Journal has been publishing trash like this for decades.

Rupert Murdoch is famous in Australia because he believes climate change is a wonderful thing. All his medias are instructed to support climate-denial:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/akewxe/rupert-murdochs-sky-news-australia-is-a-cesspit-of-climate-misinformation-

https://www.insider.com/rupert-murdochs-news-corp-australia-bushfires-2020-1

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/1/24/how-murdochracy-controls-the-climate-debate-in-australia

  • 16 scientists wrote a letter to the Wall Street Journal claiming climate change is fake. Many of these scientists are linked to the oil industry.

  • 255 respected scientists wrote an open letter to the Wall Street Journal saying climate change is real and denouncing disinformation.

https://www.triplepundit.com/story/2012/wall-street-journal-and-climate-change-denial/68696

You know what scares me the most? The Wall Street Journal is the favorite newspaper of high-income americans. It's the one newspaper that american CEOs trust.

Journalists working for the Wall Street Journal aren't stupid.

They perfectly know what's going on. Their journalism earns the paper credibility. That credibility is weaponized by Murdoch to spread his propaganda.

A few years ago, hundreds of Wall Street Journal journalists wrote a letter to Publisher Almar Latour, saying their newspaper is used to spread disinformation:

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/letter-from-wsj-news-staff-to-publisher-almar-latour/ea78fefb574b76a6/full.pdf

They were told to fuck off if they don't want to be fired. Anyone subscribing to the WSJ is part of the problem.

Rupert Murdoch has done a staggering amount of damage. And people still "trust" his garbage media. The New York Post is one of the most visited website in the US.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 5 points 5 hours ago

it was because of this fuck that we got stuck with an inferior NBN in Australia. We could have had a MINIMUM of 1Gbps for almost EVERYONE, but this fucker didn't want his fuckwit foxtel to have competition, so he decided (let's face it, HE decided) that his puppets turnballs was to gut the NBN, and now we're stuck with a multibillion dollar failure.

Fuck the murdochs so fucking hard. I have an (ir)rational hatred of them. WE COULD HAVE HAD 1Gbps!

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

And yet, Murdoch is simply a symptom of the real disease, capitalism. Without him, we would still be in the same situation, because capitalism requires endless growth and both incentivizes and requires greed and individualistic behavior from those with power.

A global socialist revolution is the only thing that can save our species and the biosphere.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 13 points 18 hours ago

This is an incredible comment. With a little work it would make a fine article to publish online.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We know he's a monster and yet we do nothing to stop him. The laws are powerless. Simply shooting him is seen as gauche.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 6 points 17 hours ago

I don't mind being seen as gauche.
The problem is I live thousands of miles away and have no guns.

Plus it isn't just Murdoch. Shooting him is a good start, yes. But just about every large corporation CEO, and very billionaire etc, and most world leaders, and most politicians also need to be 'taken out' for anything to really start changing.
(Which I'm fine with btw. Shoot away, Luigi)