this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
854 points (98.7% liked)
memes
22196 readers
2949 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They just keep reinventing trains except shittier.
What if we made the train wide and flat, gave it armor plating, bolted a pair of claws on the front, and let it run sideways?
Traininisation
Boxcarcinization.
Crustation
It's always trains
it's ~pods~. completely different.
Yes, trains have real throughput.
"Trains, but without the tracks."
Trains but without having to sit next to people who aren't your staff.
What if we had trains, but bigger?
I’m not making a joke, I honestly think making the track a little wider would be a great innovation.
Well it would require wider curves and be incompatible with existing rolling stock.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_track_gauges
Obligatory XKCD.