this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
529 points (98.4% liked)

196

6430 readers
1618 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So you prefer to roll over and get genocided?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Not what I said.

I'd flee or if there's any reasonable chance to survive, I'd join some self-defense militia. But I wouldn't die for a state.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Arbitrarily drawing the line at your feet for what form of group is acceptable doesn’t change that your self-defense militia would in fact be akin to “a state” in the context of what is being discussed.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

it were a state, I wouldn't have a say in whether or not I will help in defending that state.

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There are enough states with voluntary recruitment?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 16 hours ago

How long do you think that remains voluntary once a state of emergency is called out due to war?

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So if your land gets taken over, you'll go somewhere else and take someone else's land?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Is that hou you view refugees? As "taking someone else's land"?

Ok, Mr Musk. /s

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

There's a big difference between inviting someone into your home and someone entering uninvited. There's also a big difference between inviting one person into your home versus ten people.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Ok. I'll better not ask you about your opinion on the "refugee crisis" of 2015 or what you think about refugees drowning in the mediterranean sea.

You're probably also in favour of male Ukranian refugees between 18 and 60 in losing their residence permit in Germany in 2028.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know enough about these situations to comment on them. In isolation, a non-zero amount of suffering and death is obviously worse than none. But the world isn't an isolated bubble like that. When you consider everything in its totality, it's no longer so obvious what the correct objective should be, and that's with the assumption that we can even even devise a measurable score for any of these objectives. Do we care for a lower bound on everyone's quality of life? Do we want to maximize some quality of life average or total? Do we want to maximize the duration of human existence? Who is this "everyone"? Everyone alive today? Everyone who will ever exist? Do we give the same weight to every person? Or should we use some discounted weighting so that present humans get higher priority than future humans? Or should we put a cap on how much of our collective resources we can allocate to any given individual?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What the fuck are you talking about?

Whatever tangent you're on about: I can't experience anything anymore if I'm dead. And I'm sure as shit doing anything in my power not to die "for my nation".

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

I don't know. You brought up all those other scenarios. I don't know how they're relevant either.

Anyway, why would it not be a good thing if others want to put their lives on the line so that you can live your life in peace, or flee successfully if it comes to that?