this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
175 points (100.0% liked)

News

38138 readers
1582 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Polestar will no longer be allowed to sell new vehicles in the United States beginning with the 2027 model year after the Trump administration denied the Swedish electric-vehicle maker authorization under federal rules governing connected vehicle technology, according to Reuters.

The decision essentially blocks Polestar from introducing new models in the US market as Washington continues to express national security concerns over vehicles with technology tied to China.

Other automakers with Chinese ownership have sought different courses of action. Volvo Cars received authorization from the Commerce Department in May, though the automaker said it must continue demonstrating compliance across its US lineup.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BigTwerp@feddit.uk 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Unfortunately people these days insist on being able to connect their phone to the car and use sat-nav, basically a car without that is almost unsellable in the current market. They could probably swap out the module with Chinese chips with one made in USA... If anyone even produces one?

Edit, I can't reply to all of you dumb fucks telling me what we already know about connecting a phone to a car. 1) GPS enabled sat-nav with live traffic updates does require an internet connection. And 2) I don't think Americans really understand how thoroughly your government has fucked you over; the restriction on domestic wireless communication doesn't need an internet connection, it applies to any wireless communication even if theoretically it cannot be connected to the internet (don't believe me, read the law).

[–] Robomekk@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

CarPlay/Android Auto doesn’t require a modem in the car. Your phone already has a modem in it.

[–] yogurt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Commenters wanted BIS to define “integrated or attached hardware or software” to clarify whether software or hardware attached by a Bluetooth device or USB to a vehicle would be subject to the rule, or if the rule includes only integrated technologies. Per its definitions, this final rule is not limited to integrated technologies.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/16/2025-00592/securing-the-information-and-communications-technology-and-services-supply-chain-connected-vehicles

Carplay is also banned. The rule is fake, it's just pretextual to ban Chinese cars so it will always be stretched to cover any possible Chinese car. The US forced free trade on everybody assuming it would always win, and now that it's losing it's just cheating. It needs to stick some kind of bullshit technicality on the treaty violation so it can abuse WTO procedure to loop this case around through appeals for 30 years before China can get a final ruling against the US.

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

It may not need one for those products, but I promise it has one anyway.

Internet connectivity in a car should be opt-in with a simple mechanism to enable/disable. No calls to the manufacturer, no dealer trip, no app.

[–] BigTwerp@feddit.uk -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You don't understand, read my post

[–] JustALurker@fedinsfw.app 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You don't understand, we don't need the car to provide a cellular modem to collect data on us. Our phones already provide that.

Correct, the manufacturers want the car to have a cellular modem to collect data on us.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

GPS didn’t need any form of cellular connectivity for the first 15-20 years it was in cars.

In fact it hasn’t changed in that requirement, and screen mirroring also doesn’t need spyware.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Still works great on your phone with no internet if you precached the maps for the area you'll be in.

[–] rabidhamster@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, have an old Tom Tom kicking around somewhere that's over 20 years old, I think. Worked great, you just needed to plug it into a computer every once in a very long while to update the maps. I mean, roads don't change THAT frequently.

[–] BigTwerp@feddit.uk -1 points 2 days ago

You don't understand, read my post

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

For GPS, if the phone has connectivity, the car doesn't need it. It just needs to interoperate with the phone.

As for telemetry, it is of almost no benefit to the car owner, it's a way for the manufacturer to aggregate and sell data. If it's just maintenance-related diagnostic logging, local storage on the vehicle would suffice, and it should be law that such data belongs to the owner and that there should be a way to delete it at any time if the owner so chooses, with no detrimental impact on dealer service charges or the warranty.

[–] BigTwerp@feddit.uk -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Looks like I've found another victim of the American education system.

Literacy rates must be at rock bottom there.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

basically a car without that is almost unsellable in the current market

You're gonna look really stupid when the Slate truck sells well.

By the way, your edit is disingenuously moving goalposts.

[–] BigTwerp@feddit.uk -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Your gonna look really stupid when you find out it has built in telemetry.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It doesn't, except for an optional add-on aimed at fleet operators.

[–] BigTwerp@feddit.uk -1 points 2 days ago

I totally believe you. The American education system really is fucked isn't it.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

You're citing something that absolutely doesn't require the car itself to connect to the internet.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I can do all that in my car and it has no network connectivity, have you not heard of a cellphone?

[–] BigTwerp@feddit.uk -4 points 2 days ago

You don't understand, read my post

[–] BigTwerp@feddit.uk -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You don't understand, read my post

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

I did read your post, it was dumb.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or provide a module for plug in for your sales region.

[–] BigTwerp@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's my point, I don't think there are currently any companies in the US, outside of defense contractors, that produce a module. It is impossible to comply with the law.