this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
65 points (97.1% liked)
PC Gaming
15000 readers
464 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Gabecube is very nice and open compared to a normal console, but if you're coming from a pc, it's the opposite in some ways. I personally would not want an os built around an online login.
Or atomic.. I love tinkering too much
You can have immuability without loosing tinkering possibilities. I do that on NixOS.
The more I learn the more I don't want flatpaks on my machine so of course I am requiring something else than SteamOS or bazzite.
Yeah that's another one I'm fine with flatpaks depending on the application but in most cases give me my native packages
The thing is that Flatpak failed at providing good sandboxing. Some flatpaks are well made such as as Firefox, Mozilla really put effort into getting something well packaged but unfortunately that's not the standard. Most of them are packaged like shit or for the better ones they are not as well packages as the distro official packages that have stronger quality assurance. Of course many apps only have debian or arch support and flatpaks does bring wider Linux based OS support which is cool and I do run some flatpaks on my devices.
But I hope we will have something better that will properly be sandboxed and have stronger requirements for packager to offer a global GNU/Linux publishing experience regardless of the distro, even if it comes with some drawbacks like size.
I am not hating on flatpaks but I think people over estimate the sandbox aspect and simply don't see how poorly most of them are packaged.
I use NixOS but I have a few flatpaks. They're not my preferred packaging option (nix is) but they work decently well.
Same, however it's worth noting that flatpaks are not giving us the proper sandboxed experience it promises to offer and many are packages like crap.
The OS is not built around any login. It just boots straight into Steam by default. This is the experience consumers expect from a console. But of course you can just exit it, and since it's Linux you can even disable it entirely.
Does not need an online login.
The OS requires an online login?
I don't know if the OS exactly requires an online login, but it basically boots into the Steam client, and that won't do you much good without a Steam account.
Yeah this is incorrect the OS doesn't require a steam login to work. You can bypass the steam login at boot if you want to and only need it to play steam games.
Require? I'm pretty sure you can get to desktop without, but how about big picture and gamescope? I've never seen steam ui without logging in.
You click "offline mode" if thats what you want.