this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
137 points (96.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

40021 readers
1217 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm getting annoyed with people that ask a question, have the community answer their question and troubleshoot over several days, only to delete their post and the solution.

The person asking the question is often providing the least amount of effort, so why should they have exclusive right to delete the contributions of others?

Possible fix: have a per-community option to only request deletion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's copyright, but that is easy to get around by just making it part of the terms and conditions of a website that by posting you grant a right to republish.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Any part of such contract that implies giving up rights is void and cannot apply

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If that was true open source software would not exist

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You have no rights on someone elses property by default. Licenses grant under a specific scope, they don't actually forbid

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The point is that once you have released something under an open license, it's permanently under that license and you no longer have the right to demand that other people stop publishing it (which admittedly you do have by default). Giving up rights is a thing.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A thing that doesn't apply here

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you elaborate? To me it really seems like it does apply. A more related example might be Wikipedia, which has open licensed content. Or even the whole concept of writing for pay with a contract; the person who pays you gets the rights, because you agreed to that, and you can't just demand they delete it later. These things are within how the law works. Why wouldn't it also be within how the law works to have a social media website where the condition of posting is granting a non-revocable right to publish what you wrote?

[–] TheSteamingPileOfShit@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not a lawyer, but in at least the US, that would make sites publishers. They're not. They're basically hosts, which, as I understand it, they would otherwise be legally responsible for the content that users post on their sites. No company wants that, but will at least try some form of rules and/or moderation so as to have a defense of good wiill, should they ever have to appear in court due to content users posted on their site.

Edit: clarification

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

As I understand it the distinction between a website hosting user content and another publisher is Section 230, but that is about limiting liability for publishing user content, and I see no reason to believe that this law would prohibit users from granting such websites non-revocable rights to publish their writing.