this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
38 points (89.6% liked)

chat

8625 readers
163 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i was under the impression that were explicitly against genAI but i found that some people are actually VERY pro genai and quite dismissive of its risks. this happened on lemmy but i saw people getting downvoted for saying that genAI in its current state is harmful to the environment. i saw the old bullshit of how ”i use AI for art because i cant draw”, it was crazy. i called someone a Promptitute and someone unironically told me not to say that, just so much. so can everybody pls affirm you dont support that crap.

another user straight up admitted that they use AI as a friend and to gn to... i dont care how much we have in common ideologically, i cant support you gning to chatgpt and thinking its your friend...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AltMaarri@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also we already have "clanker".

[–] Jackilope@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Ah yes, lets pretend to use slurs against the chatbot, that will show em

I despise that shit, marker of an unfunny person

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago

Yeah, it just reeks of reddit.

[–] joaomarrom@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I thought it was funny for about two days until I saw how white people were having way too much fun making little skits, like one I saw where it's a 50's style diner and the people inside it refuse to let a clanker take a seat.

[–] Jackilope@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

This is the kind of shit im talking about but some people here all just telling on themselves in my replies/dms

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

it's a 50's style diner and the people inside it refuse to let a clanker take a seat.

Wtf? what-the-hell

[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

ridiculous stretch of the meaning of the word "slur". if it isn't applied to people it can't be a slur

it functions well as a derogatory term for LLM chatbots because it sounds like a slur, but that doesn't make it a slur

[–] tocopherol@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

People have been saying "clanker" on star wars games online for years referring to the droids, it's definitely the same people who often say other slurs, like calling something "gay" as a slur is still a slur even if it's not referring to a person.

[–] Jackilope@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like a slur, used like a slur, carrys the same energy as a slur, but since the target is not human it doesnt cause harm to anyone at all

Youre coping lol

[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

slurs are bad because they because they hurt people. the term clanker isn't targeted at people, so it isn't a slur

if you think critical for two seconds about what makes a slur a slur and what makes them offensive you will see this

[–] Jackilope@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Hard disagree. Using language like that even if not targetting real groups still normalizes the use of similar language towards other groups, including real racism, and can still cause harm to people due to the similarities to real slurs

Youre just simply ignoring the impact and optics of your actions to make yourself feel better

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Calling clanker a slur is the same as calling cracker a slur. The exact same amount of systemic harm is being perpetuated by those two words.

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought Clanker was a Star Wars slur thing that the clones would say to the droids. Unless i'm misremembering stuff.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

Could be, I'm not a big star wars fan and don't base any of my worldviews on it. The point still stands though, star wars droids are a fictionally oppressed class in the same way that white people are a fictionally oppressed class.

I think calling chatbots clankers is stupid but calling it a slur is minimizing the actual harm to real people targeted by real slurs

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Crackers will make it into a slur.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

Someday in the far far future when actually sentient robots exist and are oppressed, yeah probably

[–] AltMaarri@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I may be wrong but I've seen it used against people that use LLMs, not against the text generator themselves (which would indeed make no sense). A use for which it seems more useful - if only to shame these people.

[–] Jackilope@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've never really seen it used that way myself, when the trend kicked off it was mostly just making some kind of racist sounding statement but replacing the racial slur with clanker. "No daughter of mine is going to date a..." and so on.

[–] AltMaarri@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

IIRC I've seen it used that way on SneerClub on reddit-logo ; no idea how generalized it is.

[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

isn't clanker usually used to describe the llm bots themselves, as opposed to their users?

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was convinced once I saw an article about people basically just quoting westerners about indigenous and black people but saying 'clanker'. Before that I couldn't imagine why we should care. But the article cited some black creators (also definitely at least partially motivated by clicks, to be fair) describing how hurtful it was to see jokes about apartheid America being made light of by just saying clanker instead of rhe N-word in very specific things to anti-black pre-civil-rights-racism

the article cited some black creators (also definitely at least partially motivated by clicks, to be fair) describing how hurtful it was to see jokes about apartheid America being made light of by just saying clanker instead of rhe N-word in very specific things to anti-black pre-civil-rights-racism

the problem here is racism, not hating LLMs. no doubt there is plenty of cracker scum who use the term clanker because it makes them feel like they're getting away with saying the n word

that said, i don't think it's fair to conflate "using the term clanker bc LLMs are bad" with "using the term clanker bc you're a racist who simply can't avoid conflating bad things with black peolle"

i still think there's some value in using as derogatory a term as possible for LLMs, just to discourage people from using them. they should not be allowed to be perceived as cool or good or useful in any way

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought that was a star wars slur for the Droid Army that fought against the republic?

https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Clanker

i don't know anything about star wars, i'm an adult

[–] AltMaarri@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've seen it used for the users themselves, but given you're the third one to make the same remark I'm pretty sure I'm wrong.

fair enough, maybe the use of it has extended to users since the last time i saw the word "in the wild" so to say