this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
1010 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

87833 readers
3814 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 157 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Oh look all the "chrome but in a different outfit" browsers are doing the same terrible shit? What a shocker, no one could have predicted that the many many things all on the same base where actuality just fake competition.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 73 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Firefox has webserial support now. I no longer need anything chromium. Let them rot.

[–] JohnHammerSky@lemmy.today 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Communicating with external devices via USB or the old D-Sub connectors.

Printers, microcontrollers, instruments, etc... Directly instead of through the OS.

Notably, ESPHome Programmer uses it for flashing ESP32s wired. Other companies like Solo Motor Controllers use it for delivering a user GUI to customers that is always updated but that can switch between versions instantly for production without having to having to deal with window's broken method of having to manually search and download .exes for every program.

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 6 points 2 months ago

never heard of it till now. neat!

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I had to use Brave earlier this year to flash firmware onto a Meshtastic device. It's good to hear that Firefox has that option now.

[–] baner@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even grapheneOS use it for adb into your phone to flash the images.

[–] torlakur@szmer.info 9 points 2 months ago

webserial

they use WebUSB in GrapheneOS

[–] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago

Really? Holy shit I can switch to zen fully at work and at home and uninstall chromium. Webserial was literally the only thing I needed

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 5 points 2 months ago

It does? Guess I can finally yeet Chromium from my machine then.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They are all chrome with google scratched out and their name written in sharpie in its place.

Of course they are all doing it, cause they are all the same thing.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They don't even try to pretend to fight it.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

because theres no fighting google.

Microsoft tried, and google won, which is why Edge became a chrome reskin instead of what it was before.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Yeah, but the worse they are the longer they live apparently.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The winning move is not to do business with them, don't compete just exist and pretend they don't exist. Microslop played the game and lost, but it is a stupid silly game.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

kinda hard to do when google holds the internet by the balls. and can twist at any moment to get what they want.

Microsoft and Mozilla employees have both accused them of doing this in the past, to sabotage non-chrome browsers on google services, to make chrome look better and drive users to chrome.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

News to me, Does google hold this site by the balls? They have a lot of power yes, but they are not some unsinkable boat.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They only 'hold the internet by the balls' if you are using and reliant on Google products.

There are hundreds (if not more) tutorials and lists online to guide you through degoogling

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure we can get thousands of websites and every major corporation to degoogle cause you said so.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Where did I say they should? (I do think it, but didn't say it).

The only person here that spoke supposed 'facts' was you, saying that Google holds the internet by the balls. Which is true only in your corner of the world. Google definitely has a majority control, but we already have a big (and growing) movement with European Digital Sovereignity, De-Googling and loads of others.

Up to you if you want to let Google hold the internet that you use 'by the balls'.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All the FF forks are the same. Soft forks.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Pale Moon is not a soft fork.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago (4 children)

God it still pisses me off what they did to my boy Opera. All of us left when they diverted after v12. We all saw this coming.

Then Vivaldi came which I have tried in quite a while but it sucked. Firefox it is.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

I like Vivaldi except for two things: it uses the same engine as Chrome so facilitates Google's stranglehold on web standards, and it is closed-source. For functionality and design it's one of the best, but those are important downsides.

[–] reka@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

What about vivaldi sucked for you?

[–] tomjuggler@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah opera used to be the one. I'm STILL pissed that they deleted all of my notes

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Chrome is death to a browser, there is little reason to exist if google gets to make the big calls.

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's a damn shame, I've always liked Vivaldi otherwise. I've been dual running Vivaldi and Firefox for years now, Vivaldi for casual browsing and Firefox for more serious stuff + YouTube.

Oh well, it's time to do a full switch, I guess.

Kinda funny, I've been doing the exact same thing with Win/Linux for approximately the same length of time. Needed Win because of dome software that just doesn't work linux, and sadly, I still do.

Google and Microsoft can go fuck each other with a frozen cactus for all I care.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The folks at Vivaldi have been doing some work on their internal ad blocker, I think with the intention to bring most of the functionality of uBo internally so that it doesn't have to be an extension. Not sure how far along they are, but maybe they're intentionally keeping it quiet.

[–] reka@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Vivaldi have earned and deserve a lot of trust here I believe. All my chromium eggs sit in their basket.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Same here. I'm an Opera refugee so to say (and I had high hopes for Opera actually). I've been using Vivaldi since its first public alpha/preview/whatever they were calling it.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yup, Vivaldi user for 8 years and it hasn't let me down yet, but this post is troubling news.

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Aye, I'm just not sure how it's going to play out. One can hope, though. It's definitely one of the best options Chrome-wise either way.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm wondering what the decision making was when they were starting (which is now 10 years ago already, time flies, yo).

From today's perspective, a Firefox fork sounds way more logical. Back then maybe things with Blink/Chromium weren't looking so grim, maybe they were relying on the experience of that part of the team that moved over from Opera...

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

10 years ago Google was trusted and liked. The cracks were starting to show, but we're talking about the Google that was still open sourcing a lot of their products and loudly opposing government censorship of the internet.

[–] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, on a technical level chromium isn't a terrible browser engine. Building your own engine from scratch is Extremely Hard™ and it's entirely possible to build a decent browser on top of it, so I can understand why most alternative projects have done just that.

It's just... google's control over chromium is concerning.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And an ecosystem of one engine is not healthy. Even if google was not google, this is a massive risk to take for the Easy™ way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah its a real surprise. :)

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

Illusion of choice