this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
645 points (98.4% liked)
196
6057 readers
567 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is fascinating to me. Like, I got 90% every time, and I wasn't really analyzing at all, just going by feel. Most of the time I answered within the first 2 or 3 seconds. And I'm not saying that to brag because I genuinely have no idea what we were doing differently. Like if you asked me to teach you I'd just be vaguely gesturing and shrugging helplessly. It's just vibes.
I want to see someone do a study on this. Why is it that some people instantly discern most AI images as feeling wrong somehow and other people don't? What is the common factor here?
I do agree that it's fascinating and I'm rather curious why is it that way. Lacking this ability seems to make me especially vulnerable to AI manipulation.
Like for me there isn't any different vibe or feeling between AI or human made pictures. Those are all the same. I have to carful scrutiny every picture to find stereotypical AI anomalies. For example text on the background being in alien language or random lines, some object on the picture not making sense aka straight line disappearing after going behind some object (continuity) or items melting into one or the old one of too many fingers, but with image compression algorithms, the background anomalies can sometimes become indistinguishable from just background blur and anomalies are getting rarer and rarer.