this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
244 points (95.5% liked)

World News

56702 readers
1536 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

All of this is solved with just using more single occupancy bathrooms. Just an open hallway with rooms and toilets and changing stations. Sinks in the hallway.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Not allowed. I’ll copy from another post:

No, there’s already rules in place from the previous government which says that all new builds and buildings euch are changing their use must have separate, sex-segregated toilets, unless the building is physically too small for anything other than a single room with a single toilet and sink. You can have gender-neutral toilets as well but not instead

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

If only laws could be changed

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So make the toilets as outlined above, but on the last two doors in the row mark one male and one female.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah. The minority of loud stupid/paid people who care about this really are the ones who should be inconvenienced. If you want a gendered bathroom then there's an outbuilding you can use. It's on one plot so technically we're still within code.

[–] HuePony@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That’s anti-trans bigotry for you

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All single toilets are sex-segregated if you enter alone and close the door.

Your sex is on one side of the door, all other sexes are on the other.

The issue only happens when you attempt to write a sign that predicts the sex, or if more people has to take a shit together in the same room.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

As the law stands at the moment, if you’re building a new non-domestic building or changing the function of an existing building and you have three toilets, each of which is a single room containing one individual toilet and a sink and which can be locked from the inside, then cannot all be accessible to everybody. One must be exclusively for women and one for men. And, as per the new guidence, which one someone can use is solely to be determined by what gender they were assigned at birth

Yes, it’s incredibly stupid, but that’s what the law currently says

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 1 month ago

As a parent of two, this is best for the kids they claim to worry about. It makes potty training much less stressful

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

This is not a bad consequence, better for all of us, even if the trigger is fear and spite