this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
33 points (78.0% liked)

Technology

42983 readers
55 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] littleomid@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A compiler is deterministic. LLMs are by definition nondeterministic.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trying to understand where you might be going with this. Is the implication that non-deterministic/stochastic algorithms have no practical use in engineering?

[–] littleomid@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, they have a place where stochastic algorithms are necessary. For writing a hello world application, no stochastic algorithm is necessary. Comparing compilers with LLMs is comparing apples with oranges.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it will become more apparent over time. But consider that the practice of software engineering is a stochastic process. Give 10 different engineers the same goal, and you'll get 10 different solutions.

[–] aldhissla@piefed.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

If a SW dev applicant gives a 20-file generated output for a 20-line assessment problem and can't explain single lines of "their" code, either what they should be doing or why "they" had written it, it's gonna be a no from me, dawg. A standard problem might have different solutions, but fixing the issue of the day to the satisfaction of a rabidly vocal customer base might have one at most, and it will change multiple times on a whim.

So the LLM might have helped them cheat their way to an MSc, but there's no cheating your way through real life.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What you're describing is "vibe coding". For the difference between vibe coding and engineering, I'll refer you to my previous comment.

[–] aldhissla@piefed.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Edit: had problems with opening your link, replying to your linked comment now...

[–] littleomid@feddit.org 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

At that rate me walking to the store is stochastic because a grand piano could fall on my head. We have to draw the line at some logical point.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

What line are we trying to draw exactly? I think that's the part I'm still confused on.

Yes, walking to the store is a stochastic process. Ask anyone working at google maps.

[–] littleomid@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

I think you’re arguing for arguing’s sake. If you don’t see the point by now, then I am unable to make it more clear. I’m sorry.