this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
174 points (96.3% liked)
Asklemmy
54317 readers
435 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The Democrats so rarely have full control of the executive and legislative branches, and when they do it is by such slim margins that the most right-leaning Democrat has the whole thing by the balls.
Looks at Obama's Presidency: Democrats had a single vote margin in the House for only 41 days. That single vote was an Independent (Joe Lieberman). We would have had single payer health care if not for him. What we got disappointing but it was a lot better than nothing. Outside of those 41 days everything had to be a compromise with the Republicans.
I think we need to stop the "both sides are the same" stuff until we've actually given the Democrats a big margin in both houses for an extended period so that we give the left leaning members an opportunity to get some things moving.
"how can you expect us to do anything when we barely even control the entire government. You have to deliver us a permanent one party state and we'll talk about making some changes in a few decades"
Funny how that's never an issue for Republicans
this is just an excuse; republicans have no such issues when they have a narrow majority themselves.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH LOLLLLLL XDDDD
"How many times do we gotta teach you this lesson old man?"
American politics is kayfabe. If it hadn't been Lieberman, it would've just been someone else.
The rule for needing 60 votes is set by a vote of 50.
Are you thinking on the scale of hundreds of years?
Problem is that waiting, hoping and praying for a Democrat super majority is the exact fallacy they want you to believe. "Put down those pitchforks and torches, you just gotta wait until the good guys win the presidential election, the house, the Senate, the DOJ, AND they aren't a conservative in disguise that vetos or votes against whatever the Democrats are currently working towards"