this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
13 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2563 readers
55 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Want to wade into the sandy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Another review of Yudkowsky and Soares: if anyone reads it, everyone laughs (sadly, Substack). This one gestures to the whole university of academic fields that a book like this touches on.

The reviewer mentions "The wickedly smart Scott Aaronson" and maybe he means Aaronson's academic publications because his general blogging is not impressive.

[–] lurker@awful.systems 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Wow, that’s probably one of the most in-depth critiques of the book I’ve read. Kudos to the OP

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I nearly bounced off when I couldn't tell if his praise of Kissinger (spit) was ironic, but it was ultimately a very well-rounded examination.

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He does seem to list Kissinger as one of several "smart people" which is odd for a US military veteran

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 3 points 1 day ago

came here to react from the same sentence

load more comments (1 replies)