this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
37 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

11503 readers
31 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When President Donald Trump attempted to overturn the 2020 election, the institutional guardrails of American democracy held — but just barely.

If faced with the same tests today, those guardrails and the people who held the line would largely be missing, a ProPublica examination found.

At least 75 career officials who once held roles at federal agencies related to election integrity and safety are gone. Two dozen appointees — including many who either actively worked to reverse the 2020 vote or are associates of such people — have been hired to replace them. And once-fringe actors now have access to vast powers.

As the midterms approach, current and former government officials and election security experts expressed concerns that Trump appointees who’ve espoused debunked conspiracy theories about balloting are now in positions to control the narrative around the vote’s soundness.

It’s hard to debunk false claims “coming with the seal of the federal government,” said Derek Tisler, counsel and manager with the Brennan Center for Justice’s elections and government program. “I certainly worry what damage that could do to voters’ confidence.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honestly would be more shocked by any upcoming elections not won by republicans.

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There have been several elections recently that they’ve lost, and there isn’t really anything the federal executive can do to alter those outcomes. The federal executive (trump and his people) can sue to challenge results on grounds of violating some federal law, but they have to actually win the case for that to effect anything. There is no pathway for them to unilaterally block or overturn election results.

The SAVE act was attempting to change that by moving a lot of oversight and management up to the federal level and under the executive branch, but that failed to pass.

In all likelihood there will be a flurry of legal challenges from trump’s people after the midterms, but those won’t stop people taking office while they’re being fought in court, and realistically they will lose the cases since they’re not based on anything.

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] megopie@beehaw.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Completely irrelevant to a discussion of trumps ability to alter election outcomes using the federal executive.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

they certainly won't if you don't live in the us thats for sure

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

So long as the important things are secured, they can afford to ignore the small stuff, and in fact it's useful even if Dems did win a few (distraction and ability to focus blame upon).