196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
view the rest of the comments
Some recommended reading about George "I should like to put it on record that I have never been able to dislike Hitler" Orwell:
one could say the widespread misperception of who he actually was and what he stood for is rather... orwellian 🙄
"I should like to put it on record that I have never been able to dislike Hitler. Ever since he came to power—till then, like nearly everyone, I had been deceived into thinking that he did not matter—I have reflected that I would certainly kill him if I could get within reach of him, but that I could feel no personal animosity."
I think the first sentence was taken a bit out of context. In the second he says would kill him if got the chance to. I think he's just trying to say that Hitler was charismatic.
Interesting that someone like Asimov has not seen how technology would make this possible, like it’s right now
What no Foucault does to a MF.
The idea that every person will only behave as though they are being watched if they are actually being watched, fails to recognize that if people know that they could be watched at any time, but can't actually see if the watcher is watching them, they will behave as though they are being watched all the time.
Panopticon goes brrrr
He did. A few paragraphs later he says:
Both Orwell and Asimov assumed that The Party would care about false positives.
The guy fought Nazi supplied Nationalists in the Spanish Civil War. This take is nuts, he almost died for the CNT-FAI. He's not a Nazi sympathizer.
And went on to literally work for the British intelligence services and provide them lists of communists, you could read the provided sources.
Just a thought experiment: since you apply this logic that fighting the Nazi-supplied nationalists in the Spanish civil war makes one an antifascist, do you agree that the greatest antifascist force in Europe was the USSR as the only country supplying weapons, munitions, tanks and airplanes to the Republican and Anarchist during the civil war?
The USSR didn't supply the anarchists. ~~They~~ The Communists actively refused to give them arms and worked against them. That was the cause of Orwell's disdain towards them. source: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/noam-chomsky-on-anarchism#fn70
Edit: Correcting sentencing after being corrected in a reply.
Circular sourcing, you're quoting Orwell himself in that citation.
Regardless, "the communists" referred to in this link are not the USSR, they're the Spanish communists, you're conflating the two again and therefore pushing the fascist propaganda that the Jewish Bolsheviks were puppeteering everything in Spain. Also, are there any quantitative modern studies of the scale of this "embargo"? Because I've provided sources* proving that the extent of the "anarchist repression" by the USSR in Spain was about 20 individuals, and motivated by the revolts in Barcelona that the Fascists and Nazis were pushing for.
*I linked the sources in another comment, here is my research on the topic as a Spaniard myself. If you read through this, you'll see that Stalin himself commended the anarchists in private meetings with the Republican diplomats and tried to get the Spanish Second Republic to collaborate with them
Edit: adding Stalin's opinion on collaboration with anarchists:
(Translated by myself from one of the sources linked, feel free to browse through the books yourself as I did).
To be honest I don't care if the communists are Soviet or Spain. The arms that the USSR was sending didn't reach the anarchists. That was the only claim I was refuting.
Reiterating for the sake of clarity.
The fact that the footnote ends with Orwell's own quote is just a nice tie back to the discussion.
Regarding the rest of the comment I'm not interested in reenacting "anarchist vs ML: spanish civil war" online theater. I just wanted to push back on the claim that the USSR supplied anarchists.
Least intellectually dishonest anticommunist.
I'll go ahead and spend one fucking hour reading through the sources again just to prove you wrong because I'm 100% certain that the at least half of weapons that the anarchists used were of Soviet origin, and I know for certain you won't provide such sourcing because if you actually did the reading you wouldn't be saying that the USSR didn't supply the anarchists too.
Otherwise prove me wrong: give me a modern source estimating the availability of weaponry of anarchists in the Spanish civil war and its origin.
Ok. You wanna dance? Let's dance.
The USSR did supply (provide any weapons to) anarchists in Spain.
However the Communists¹ didn't supply (provide as many weapons as they could have to) anarchists in Spain.
¹: because as you pointed out the fault wasn't just the USSR but Spanish as well.
I was hoping that the context made the distinction clear but clearly that is not the case.
Give. Me. A. Material. Numeric. Source.
Until you do that, your analysis is exclusively vibes-based, and should be rejected.
That is my source. It's good enough for me. The fact that Chomsky (a well respected academic*) published that is good enough for me.
*: There are ties to Epstein, but for me that doesn't invalidate his academic opinion.
It seems good enough for you because it reinforces your previous beliefs. Keep calling yourself a leftist while you ignore material understanding of history and reality.
From the citation you quoted:
It's a well-known historical fact that the Aragón front was mostly limp and that there was no pushing by either side for the longest time. From "González-Ruibal, A. (2020). The Archaeology of the Spanish Civil War (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429260131":
Orwell continues to be an unreliable source. It's incredible to me that you still quote him as an authority figure when he's patently lying.
On that very source, the author performs archaeological excavations and, what do you know, what he finds the most from Republicans are Soviet munitions and Polish grenades!
That's a lot of text to type "I'm moving the goalposts from my original statement that the USSR didn't supply the anarchists because the Spanish Republican government (not communist) applied certain restrictions to anarchist weapon deliveries that I refuse to quantitatively source".
Our disagreement is not ideological, i'm not arguing for you to stop being an anarchist neither you for me to stop being a Marxist-Leninist. We're arguing about demonstrable historical events that can be studied in the literature. You're a comrade to me, which is precisely why I expect quality sourcing with MATERIAL, NUMERICAL evidence when discussing topics such as "a communist blockade of weaponry towards the anarchists". I wouldn't ask for such sources from a lib because I know they don't do the reading, I just expect better from comrades.
After taking a walk and taking time for some reflection. Yeah. You're right. I don't really know what I'm talking about and am taking a "vibes-based" approach. However for me that's preferable to giving vanguardists any credit for anything.
That being said I did find this: https://socialismtoday.org/archive/38/spain38.html
Now I can't find an actual open copy of the book (nor am I spending that much effort looking for it) so I can't really give you anything more.
The May Days is not some unknown event.
I can walk down the street here see the bullet holes.
What's your point?
You don't need Orwell to know that the anarchists and Stalinists fell into opposition.
I don't see where I argued that the may days didnt happen
Being anti communism is the same as being pro Nazi now?
Always has been, but not sure why you're telling this in response to my comment
🙄 MLs are not the only leftists. Pretending they are is flatly dishonest.
Everything we know about Orwell disagrees, from his review of Mein Kampf to his comments about Jews and Homosexuals. He opposed fighting the literal German Nazis until war actually broke out. The civil was was a few years and a single book, and hardly representative of his entire life.
ohh hell nah they made a tanky conservapedia 💀
Didn't he also call Indians "yellow-faced animals?"
Its a bit off topic, but its really amusing in that Isaac Asimov article how he talks about the Spain thing where Socialists, Communists, and Anarchists were at odds. Basically, the left righting amongst themselves.
The more things change...