this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
105 points (74.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39354 readers
1195 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s a movie starring his nephew in the lead role, approved by his estate, and by all accounts it just feels like an attempt to whitewash him. This is a man who was accused of being a serial child molester, settled with a family out of court for $25 million just to avoid a trial (Chandler), and openly admitted he slept in the same bed as kids while he was an adult (Bashir interview), among other things. I don’t really see what there is to debate.

Anything pointing this out gets backlash on movie-related subreddits, which I find wild. It makes me wonder, if Epstein could sing and dance, would he have gotten a biopic too? Would people be defending him like this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Teh@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I have a friend who worked for, and alongside MJ (they’re credited on at least one album). They became a personal friend and have a ton of amazing stories and insane memorabilia. On the day Michael died, his phone rang and rang with a LOT of people wishing him condolences.

They tell me that MJ never really got a childhood, and in some ways lived his childhood through other children. My friend spent a couple nights at his Neverland ranch with his own kids and tells me that he trusted MJ and doesnt believe for a minute that he was actually guilty of anything untoward, and that things like “sleepovers” really did happen but were really from a place of innocence and MJ just wanting to have that childlike experience that he didn’t get.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Your friend's anecdote or the victims testimony... That's a tough one.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

How do you justify that claim with that link? What in that article supports the idea that it was debunked?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aren't "anecdote" and "testimony" technically the same level of trustworthiness?

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No...

Anecdote: "he's a nice guy who didn't have a childhood so he hung out with children, he couldn't have possibly done anything wrong, I know him" -> opinion

Victim testimony: "he took advantage of my trust and innocence and molested me. I didn't realize I'm being abused and it has given me a lifetime of mental suffering" -> data

You can say you don't trust the victims, but it isn't the same as proclaiming someone definitely didn't commit a crime because I have a positive experience with them.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hmm, point taken. I think they're both equally valid data points in theory, which is what I was trying to convey, but to your point, "he didn't molest me" has much less determining power than "he molested me" when trying to determine if he molested someone. I see what you're saying now.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lots of child molesters have sad origin stories. Whoop dee doo, he didn't have a childhood. He still molested kids

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

That's the thing, though, we really don't know that he did. He did some stuff people think is pretty suspicious, but there are genuine credibility issues with the accusers. It's not impossible that there's truth to the allegations, but from what I've seen, it's more likely that greedy people took advantage of that suspicious behavior to milk him for money.