this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
750 points (91.7% liked)

Political Memes

11805 readers
2669 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 73 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

This is a class problem not a sex problem

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's right it goes in the "class issue" hole lol.

I get why people see it as a sex issue since most of the rich people in positions of power that seemingly don't face consequences are men.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

most of the rich people in positions of power that seemingly don’t face consequences are men.

which is just pure coincidence, right? in a world where genders are split 50:50, it is just the men who have skills necessary to reach these positions. no gender bias here at all...

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A lot of them come from old wealth.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

oh. well that explains it, because i am sure they don't have daughters in the old wealth, so the gender issue is off the table. hurrah!

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Two things can be true at the same time... but yeah, stay distracted from the class issue it's ONLY a gender thing for sure 100% no way it's anything else make sure it's only about men and gender and definitely NOT class. Lol

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Two things can be true at the same time

Exactly. So time for you and the other clowns who came with false dichotomy of "it is not gender issue, it is a class one" to shut up.

You are literally arguing against yourself and you don't even realize it. It would be funny if it wasn't sad.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I read through other comments and I didn't realize the sentiment some people had in this thread.

It absolutely is a gender issue and it's wild to try and say that it's only a class one.

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

You guys are sooo dumb I cant.

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

there are no bad woman and all man are bad i guess

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i don't see many rich/ceo women raping 13 year old boys.

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh well you didn't see. Okay then no 14th_cyclon see no crime, rules are the rules

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

Stop trying to make everything a gender issue and misreading everything. Clearly it's both, but trying to pretend it's not a class issue is just a complete misdiagnosis.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Plans to remake the square hole video but each shape is a civil struggle painted to make the people fight among themselves

[–] phx@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a bit of both, but the gender problem is at least partially derived from the fact that the larger portion of assholes at the top are men.

Getting rid of them or clipping their wings would likely be overall better for women. Replacing them with a billionaire-class of women would not.

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sex doesn't matter. It is sad that people are blind fighting each other and getting fooled by assholes

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't understand people who dismiss an entire gender's lived experience. How can you be so patronizing

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Op just baiting to get upvotes. Sadly there are too many comments agreeing with her. Fortunately top comments are the correct ones

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think the men on this platform struggle with any topic relating to the other gender. Case in point: needing to frame every problem exclusively through the lens of class struggle, even if it means demeaning the strugge of women or minorities. It's weird

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This post is stupid and I am surprised many people here like yeaa drueee

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Why am I not surprised about your attitude towards women.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Exactly. The fappening did not end any careers of celebrities

[–] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Por Que no los dos!?

[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You don't think Epstein's homeys had any sex problem?

/s

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think they had a whole fucking lot of sex problems.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why do you think they are mutually exclusive? I hate Lemmy sometimes. So incredibly myopic and laser focused one particular perspective.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They aren't. The Epstein class didn't exclusively harm women. But nobody likes to mention the male victims it seems.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You didn't disprove anything though. The perpetrators were predominantly male. Before you start screeching Gisslaine stop and reflect

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

.... says the one screeching...

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

M.H. Allegation: A 2021 lawsuit filed in Queens, New York, claimed that the "M.H." individual was under 17 and working as a high school intern when Epstein "induced" him into sexual acts, causing lasting mental anguish.

Whistleblower Reports: Some individuals have come forward identifying as male survivors associated with Epstein's network, including connections to other high-profile figures and trafficking rings.

Context of Abuse: While the majority of widely reported victims were young females, testimonies and legal filings suggest Epstein targeted young, vulnerable individuals regardless of gender to facilitate his trafficking ring.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't contest any of this. It doesn't negate the main point I was making. You're really invested in digging down

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

What's your point?