this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
30 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24328 readers
185 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This paper discovered the continuous math equivalent of the digital NAND gate. It turns out that a single binary operation paired with the constant 1 can generate every single standard elementary function. That operation is defined as eml(x,y)=exp(x)-ln(y). You can reconstruct constants like pi and the imaginary unit alongside basic addition and complex calculus tools using nothing but this one function.

The implications for machine learning and symbolic regression are massive. Normally when artificial intelligence tries to discover mathematical formulas from data it has to search through a chaotic space of different operators and syntax rules. Because the EML operator turns every mathematical expression into a uniform binary tree of identical nodes the search space becomes perfectly regular. You can basically treat a mathematical formula like a neural network circuit. The paper shows that when you train these EML trees using standard gradient optimizers like Adam the weights can actually snap to exact closed-form symbolic expressions instead of just giving fuzzy numerical approximations.

This finding could change how we design analog circuits and specialized computing hardware. If you only need a single instruction to execute any complex mathematical function you could build physical hardware or single instruction stack machines optimized purely for the EML operation. The fact that this was discovered by computationally stripping down a calculator rather than through purely theoretical derivation highlights how much structural beauty is still hiding in basic math.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Speaker@hexbear.net 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Meh. arXiv has plenty of cool-sounding garbage papers. Until this has some peer review behind it (or, like, one non-AI blog post from anyone near the field), this is indistinguishable from a crank paper.

ETA: Chicken and egg

xy = exp(log(x) + log(y))
x + y = log(exp(x) exp(y))

Both nice things that are true, but awfully difficult to define without some external definition of the other one.

Edit 2: Now the actual snark; I suspect if anything comes of this, it will be approximately equivalent to the physician who invented the trapezoidal rule in 1994: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8137688/