this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
212 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

21216 readers
844 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/45445434

Fox News Senior Medical Analyst Marc Siegel made some eyebrow-raising comments lamenting that birth rates are down among teenagers aged 15 to 19.

On Thursday, the National Center for Health Statistics reported that the U.S. fertility rate fell to another record low. The agency reported that the number of births per 1,000 women of childbearing age declined from 53.8 in 2024 to 53.1 last year. The latest figure represents a continuation of a decades-long decline in fertility rates.

Siegel joined Friday’s edition of America’s Newsroom, where Dana Perino said that while the continuing trend is not surprising, “the numbers might feel a little shocking.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LilRed@lemmy.org 44 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Who the fuck wants to be having kids in this day and age anyway. Also why is it up to the underage teens to push out babies to keep the population up. Yeah let's put pressure on them to ruin their entire lives before they even get to live it. Love the American standards.

[–] Steve@communick.news 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

The dude was conflating a number of things.
Teen birth rate is down the most, at 7% in 2025. 70% since 2005. Overall births are down slightly last year.
Overall we have a sub replacement birth rate of 1.53 per woman.

The last one is a societal problem. But just saying we need women to have more kids isn't a solution. You need to find out why people don't want to have as many kids. Which I would bet is almost entirely economic. Kids are a large long term expense. And if you're living paycheck to paycheck, with an uncertain financial future, a kid is a scary prospect.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The problem is the sub replacement birth rate of 1.53 per woman.

This is not actually a problem, except we want to keep the completely unsustainable economic system unchanged.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

So what's the alternative? Everyone's old and nobody produces anything? I kinda like having food and stuff and that's not fully automated yet.

[–] Steve@communick.news -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Economy or not, having one person who needs to take care of two elderly parents, themselves, and 0.75 kids isn't great. That's not the goal

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Society doesn't have to work that way.

[–] Steve@communick.news 0 points 3 days ago

Of course not. That's the point. We don't want it to work that way

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Birth rates are down all over the developed world with Japan being the hardest hit

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most of the developed world has the same societal problems that boil down to, no one has the money, time or energy to have kids.

[–] coolfission@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Also health as well. Pregnancy permanently changes a woman’s body.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I cant tell if those are rhetorical questions because you're upset...

Or if you genuinely don't understand why the oligarchs are mad kids aren't having babies...

[–] LilRed@lemmy.org 3 points 3 days ago

You must be joking if you think "I genuinely don't understand why the oligarchs are mad kids aren't having babies..."

Honestly I'm concerned just why that's the age range the "Oligarchs" are specifically calling out, not having enough babies. All I'm saying is, why is it up to the kids, and not the adults who have JOBS and MENTAL stability.

And I'll go back on my first sentence, WHO in their right mind, in 2026, is like "Yeah, the economy is in such a great place today, that I think I'll raw dog my wife until she becomes pregnant, and in 9 months I'll dish out thousands of dollars just for her to birth a child, and then dish out even more thousands of dollars for doctor bills, diapers, formula, etc. And that's just their infancy. Ok. Not everyone is financially stable to raise a child, even as a full grown adult. And not everyone is mentally stable, to raise a child.

But we're wondering why the kids aren't having kids.