196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
view the rest of the comments
I can't tell if you're messing with me or if you actually don't know the one intelligent thing that Richard Dawkins has ever said
I love that image. Here you go 🙂
...The Aristocats!
Dick
Wait, we don't like The Selfish Gene? Seems to be a good idea, at least from the evolutionary perspective if not the sociological one.
I don't mind The Selfish Gene so much as I hate Richard Dawkins for being a misogynistic transphobe who hung out with Epstein after his first conviction. For an enlightened rational athiest, he is quite narrow minded about science that doesn't agree with his reactionary worldview.
Also, he's a huge realist 🤮
Nope, that's what I was referencing (wait i think the term meme came from that book). gotta give the man the flowers that he's due
Scientifically, no. The selfish gene he posits is on the level of saying you only use 10% of your brain.
The book isn't all good. There's some strong arguments even against the concept of memes, but I think that particular idea is pretty robust
How so? Wikipedia and most sources near the top of DuckDuckGo seem to think that the idea is generally well-received, with a few minor quibbles.
The biggest problem with the book is that Dawkins demonstrates that the gods are living, evolving ideas which have developed over time to the point of being able to exert agency on the world... And then remains an atheist. Instead of concluding, as Terry Pratchett liked to joke, that the gods are alien intelligences created by humans through worship.
That would be a massive logical leap for someone to make
I don't understand what you're trying to say here. How does your last sentence flow from your first? I think most atheists would agree with the notion that gods are ideas passed down over generations. They're not real things that actually exist, but like anything people believe, the very idea of them exerts an influence on society...which we see every time a government passes a law based in religious ideology, like anti-LGBT or anti-abortion laws.
None of that even seems very controversial. Unless you're a believer in a literal god or gods, I'm not sure where the problem is.
That guy is pretty much Baudrillarding that people live in the world created by media — including folk communication like memes in this case — so if this collective consciousness says something is true, it might as well be.
(You might want to tag the user, as they regularly say pretty weird stuff, this one is rather mild for them. Or don't and let yourself be surprised.)
Sorry when you say "that guy", you're talking about Dawkins or the person I was conversing with here on the fediverse? Because to be honest I didn't think they were saying anything that didn't seem pretty much in line with what I was already agreeing with them about.
The commenter.
The difference between you and them is they're saying it doesn't matter whether Jesus or God actually physically ever existed and actually did what's ascribed to them — but, if people believe that they do or did then Jesus and God effectively exist(ed) as far as people can tell. It's kind of a variation on solipsism where the noosphere dictates the effective perceived reality instead of any one individual mind.
As I mentioned, you can catch a further glimpse of their peculiar worldview if you peruse their previous comments, but this particular take here is probably the most comprehensible I've seen from them so far.
The idea of a god is a god. Jesus actually exists, He's a psychological parasite living in the collective imagination of humanity. And He influences the world through His followers, who are sworn to serve Him.
I mean, sort of? That statement isn't literally true, but taken metaphorically it basically matches what I said.
Scholarly consensus is that he was indeed a real person who actually existed, but he obviously didn't perform the actual literal miracles described in the bible.
Yeah, sure. He doesn't literally live, but the idea of him has a powerful effect, so metaphorically you could say he influences the world through his followers.
Unless you're getting into some really fucking weird mumbo jumbo bullshit and you're trying to claim it is actually absolutely literal that he exists and exerts a force on the world directly, I don't see where you and I are in disagreement.
Well then you believe in all the gods. Elohim, Thor, Ra, etc. right?
Umm, no, I don't believe in any gods. The only effect gods have is the effect caused by people acting in accordance with their belief, shared down through the ages and evolved at every stage by the culture it's a part of, in those gods.
And this means they're alien intelligence how?
They're not human. Their minds work very differently to human minds.