news
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
view the rest of the comments
Would the US agree to permanently leave all of their bases?
Even if they did, would Iran and Israel stop fighting?
Would the US really permanently remove all sanctions and unfreeze Iranian assets?
The US doesn't have to publicly agree to leave bases permanently. It can just say that the Gulf states have to "pay more" for their own defense like they've been saying to Europe, and then they'll quietly just never reopen those bases or rebuild. They already unsanctioned Iranian oil sales. There are a ton of "Trumpian" ways to frame US withdraw from the Gulf as a "victory" for the United States. That said, unless the holders of capital really do have absolutely no idea how American empire works, I don't think Trump will be "allowed" to withdraw from the Gulf.
Sleepy Joe Biden let Iran make all those drones otherwise we would have crushed them. Also the weak liberal Democrats were too soft on Iran for decades with Obama giving them $150 billion dollars on the failed nuclear deal. Without that money America would have won and kept winning until the great people of Iran were liberated just like how we liberated Venezuela from the dictator Maduro.
They don't need to agree to it. They just won't return to the ones they've been evicted from already. That leaves a few bases in Jordan, Saudi etc. that could be "evacuated" too.
It might be that the US acts as a guarantor on that front. If Iran stops bombing Israel, they'll stop bombing Iran etc. etc., but logistically Israel hasn't got the capabilities to strike most of Iran without US support, let alone at any militarily-relevant intensity. It simply doesn't benefit the entity to continue the war without American backing.
I think they would. Not all at once, nor even follow through with it without tying ot up in bureaucratic red tape, but they'd certainly bank on Iran accepting this as an offer despite the reality in which it can be revoked at any time. part of American shock doctrine is to ensure the contracts to fix the mess go to their megacorps, after all.