this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
145 points (96.8% liked)

Not The Onion

21139 readers
1562 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Heard a god tier analogy from a friend:

"Electricity is very dangerous, but when it is controlled, in the form of a wall outlet, the risk of harm is greatly reduced to consumers. AI, in it's current state with minimal or easily bypassed protections, is like handing the consumer a live wire."

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

like handing the consumer a live wire.

Honestly, that's practically all of computerized information technology right now. Hackers, spammers, bots, foreign-state actors, trolls, viruses, government spying, manufacturer spying, information brokers, intrusive advertising, it's all just just teeming with bad stuff that requires education to navigate successfully.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I get that we should protect people from obvious danger but part of me struggles with the ridiculous levels of stupidity some of us fall prey to. I don't know if it's due to a misplaced sense of justice, cause and effect, or just me being a dick, but I want to let people deal with the consequences of their stupidity on their own. If a computer can convince you not to use your brain then I don't think you were using it much to begin with.

[–] TheOneCurly@feddit.online 1 points 4 hours ago

It's basically the same as gambling, some people are way more susceptible to it than others. You can say: "fuck those people they're weak and deserve to go broke" or you can say we as a society owe them some sort of safeguard.

[–] RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

~I want to let people deal with the consequences of their stupidity on their own.~

Those consequences affect a much much wider range of people, not just those who are stupid about it so it's not about protecting them, it is about protecting everyone including the ones who can't protect themselves.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

some of us fall prey to.

new technology presents new issues.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is just a more accessible phone sex line. It tells you what you want to hear and charges you for it.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

yeah but without the labor phone sex workers provided. or the humanity and connection.

[–] XPost3000@lemmy.ml 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

There are good uses for AI in science and medicine, primarily for number crunching and pattern recognition.

Not for making theories or decisions that require an understanding of those fields though.

Chat bots are just a cancer to humanity.

Here are some ways that AI has been helpful: https://crcs.seas.harvard.edu/news/10-wonderful-examples-using-artificial-intelligence-ai-good

^ I DO NOT AGREE WITH THE ENTIRE LIST ON THIS ARTICLE. ONLY SOME OF THESE DO I CONSIDER TO BE 'USEFUL'.

Edit: Fuck AI "art"

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world -1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

There are good uses for AI in science and medicine,

like puncturing patients' skulls because the machine god misidentifies organs?

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

The Machine God makes no such mistakes, to think as much is merely the weakness of the flesh.

+++ THERE IS NO TRUTH IN FLESH, ONLY BETRAYAL +++

+++ THERE IS NO STRENGTH IN FLESH, ONLY WEAKNESS +++

+++ THERE IS NO CONSTANCY IN FLESH, ONLY DECAY +++

+++ THERE IS NO CERTAINTY IN FLESH BUT DEATH +++

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
  1. You think that is good?
  2. Did you read past that?
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world -2 points 18 hours ago
  1. It's called a facetious statement.
  2. I don't know how to read.