this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
39 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

832 readers
564 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

article textThe last several years for Hollywood have generally been a disaster. Production has dried up in Los Angeles, as studios chase lower costs in other countries or locations.

High profile blockbusters have flopped, like Disney's "Snow White," or disappointed relative to expectations, like "Avatar: Fire and Ash." "The Marvels" in 2023 was one of the biggest money-losing films in entertainment industry history. This year, "The Bride!," made because director Maggie Gyllenhaal was upset about the election of President Donald Trump and wanted to prioritize feminist stories, was yet another massive financial disaster. Not every big budget film that's failed has incorporated politics or identity-driven storytelling, but plenty of them have.

One film that avoided politics entirely? "Project Hail Mary" starring Ryan Gosling. A film based on a book from author Andy Weir, who also wrote "The Martian," "Project Hail Mary" has become a runaway box office success.

Through just 10 days of box office, the space-set film has grossed a whopping $170 million at the domestic box office, and $153 million at the international box office. Even more impressive, and indicative of the quality of the film and most importantly, word of mouth, it dropped just 32.8% in its second weekend in theaters. By contrast, "The Bride!" dropped over 70% in its second weekend.

There are plenty of reasons and explanations for this, but one of the most obvious: "Project Hail Mary" was entertainment, not politics. And the book's author did that on purpose. Ryan Gosling and Project Hail Mary

Ryan Gosling attends the "Project Hail Mary" New York Premiere at Josie Robertson Plaza at Lincoln Center. (Photo by Jason Mendez/Getty Images for Amazon MGM Studios) Writer Andy Weir Says ‘Project Hail Mary’ Purposefully Avoided Politics

Author Andy Weir joined popular YouTube film and culture critic The Critical Drinker, aka Will Jordan, to talk about the film and his goal with the story. Jordan said that from the outside, the film was so good and well-received in part because it avoided the "crappy identity politics" taking over Hollywood.

"For me, it's a great example of what you can do now with movies," Jordan said. "If you're faithful to the source material, and you don't insult the intelligence of your audience, and give them something really interesting to grapple with, and you know, dare I say it, [don’t] try and shove, like, crappy identity politics into it, you end up with a g***** good movie at the end of it that the people just want to watch."

Weir immediately agreed, saying that's a purposeful decision he's made.

"I think you and me are kind of on the same wavelength there when it comes to fiction writing," he explained. "I never put any politics or messaging in any of my stories at all. There's no deeper meaning; there isn't even any symbolism, even non-political. There's just no symbolism at all. My books are just purely to entertain."

He continued, showing he's familiar with Jordan's work, saying, "You don't have to worry about ‘the message.'"

How refreshing is that to hear?

Believe it or not, a vast, overwhelming majority of potential moviegoers do not want to spend $15-20 on a movie ticket, plus popcorn, drinks or snacks, and get an eye-rolling lecture filled with "identity politics" and divisive ideology. What the industry has forgotten is that their job is to entertain. It's a leisure activity, not a requirement. It's a product, a consumer-based product, that they need to sell to potential "buyers."

This is how you do it, not by injecting identity and "the message" where it doesn't belong, but by focusing on story, character, and execution. That's the lesson Hollywood needs to learn from "Project Hail Mary." We'll see if they do.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Monk3brain3@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I haven't watched the movie or read the book. I probably will but it sounds a lot like interstellar. Absolute techno-escapist fantasy about humanity's future. At least that is my interpretation of interstellar. Unfortunately technology is not magic (which is what most tech obsessed people think it is, since they don't know the grind that is required for scientific progress). I mean in interstellar the threat was the Earth and crops turning against humans, or some vague nothing bullshit reason. Cowards wouldn't even call it climate change.

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Stemlord science fiction fans don't understand that all the make-believe stuff (so-true but it's based on "real science" bazinga) is just dressing to talk about problems we have now in novel or entertaining ways.

The bazinga brained assholes get caught up in making the Torment Nexus from Don't Build the Torment Nexus real rather than thinking about what the Torment Nexus is or what it means (because the curtains are blue or whatever).

I literally cannot approach stories about planet destroying issues without thinking about how I feel about climate change. The movie is literally a narrative about two extremely different beings overcoming their differences to save their homes. It's mind boggling to think that there is no political (identity or otherwise) narrative there.

bird-screm-2 Death of the author, but actually redacted-1redacted-2

[–] Monk3brain3@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well said. I'm thinking you have a better understanding of the arts than me so I liked that analysis.

It's mind boggling to think that there is no political (identity or otherwise) narrative there.

Also a lot of this problem of shallow creative media goes back to how capitalism forces creative media that wants to be popular, to essentially operate withing accepted creative limits. As a simple example, how many fictional shows or books show the ruling class getting their just deserts. Off the top my head I can only think of one anime, akame ga kill, decent show but this is hardly ever explored anywhere. Recently we saw the hilariously bad ending of game of thrones, which really wasn't that unexpected for me. There was a really good essay (it was much better put together than the nonsense articles most outlets churn out) that someone linked about just this. Wish I could find it but the core point was the same, about how capitalism produces trash media by design and necessity.

[–] Sebrof@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

May or may not the article you mentioned.

Explicitly mentions GOT and the "swerve" at the end of many stories where any character that cares about injustice and changing the world actually is an ebil bad-bad and any push for a better world is actually misguided and makes things worse. The best of all possible worlds is already here before you. Phew

There’s a common trope in media where it’s revealed, most often near the end of the story (but sometimes right off the bat), that trying too hard to do good makes you evil. Game of Thrones, HBO’s Watchmen, The Hunger Games, and many other shows, movies, and games all have endings that seem to come out of nowhere, as if they’re imposed from without rather than obeying the story’s inner logic.

https://redsails.org/the-swerve/

[–] Monk3brain3@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago

yeah thats the one. Really good read