this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
75 points (94.1% liked)
askchapo
23253 readers
166 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
why though
people can do stuff robots can't, people doing it inspires the kids more than robots. ~~there's a 0.0000001% chance i win some seat lottery and get to go~~
yeah but i think theres the risk / benefit analysis. especially with things like going to mars, would the risks really be worth the science? people dying in space is not super inspiring.
Surely that risk/benefit calculation ought be left to the ones actually being put at risk, the Astro/Cosmo/Taikonauts in question.
I'm sure there's a number of those who would be absolutely giddy to do a Mars Landing, so long as the risk was low enough to be possible at all.